Skip to content

improve build-docker-image#1635

Closed
Emilgardis wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
improve-build-docker-image
Closed

improve build-docker-image#1635
Emilgardis wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
improve-build-docker-image

Conversation

@Emilgardis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@Emilgardis Emilgardis force-pushed the improve-build-docker-image branch from ac2b783 to 989e06b Compare March 3, 2025 20:38
@Emilgardis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/ci try --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@Emilgardis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

damn, it doesn't spin up the action with the version in this pr :/

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Try run for comment

Failed Jobs

@Emilgardis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@Emilgardis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Closing this in favor of #1636

@Emilgardis Emilgardis closed this Apr 4, 2025
@Emilgardis Emilgardis deleted the improve-build-docker-image branch April 4, 2025 21:04
@reneleonhardt

reneleonhardt commented May 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Emilgardis can you restore your branch so I can cherry-pick your improvements on top of 1636?
I don't know why GitHub doesn't allow to download a patch file when the rich diff is still being displayed... 🤷

@Emilgardis Emilgardis restored the improve-build-docker-image branch May 21, 2025 16:03
@Emilgardis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

restored

@reneleonhardt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks! Is everything needed?
I have to squash everything, but Commit 2 is doubt this works, very WIP 😅

reneleonhardt pushed a commit to reneleonhardt/slint-cross that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
@Emilgardis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Thanks! Is everything needed? I have to squash everything, but Commit 2 is doubt this works, very WIP 😅

No everything is not needed!

@reneleonhardt

reneleonhardt commented May 22, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

So how can I know what's needed and what's not?
It would be easier if this branch would only contain improvements to the target branch.

Why don't you target the other pull request yourself like I did for you?
Then you can prepare everything which would be of value for your contributor.

@Emilgardis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I made this PR to experiment mostly, it was only a draft. The intent was to enable multi-platform building using docker buildx bake but I didn't get that far.

@reneleonhardt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ok. And what does it mean? Should your improvements be integrated here or do you want to refine them later?

@Emilgardis

Emilgardis commented May 23, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I don't know what you mean, improvements are good, and they should always be refined. But there's nothing in this specific pr that absolutely has to be included.

@reneleonhardt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just tried to help because the contributor said it would be too hard to apply your improvements.
Now your branch could be applied with one click, it's not my decision to actually do it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants