-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
pyamrex v26.04 #63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pyamrex v26.04 #63
Changes from 3 commits
3d4e1fa
e39f51f
ea4f9cc
69ba436
988a207
83b32e3
e8489e3
1a276f9
5a35ec4
f3290bf
fd2b25d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ | ||
| python: | ||
| - 3.11 | ||
| - 3.12 | ||
| - 3.13 | ||
| - 3.14 | ||
|
|
||
| mpi: | ||
| - nompi | ||
| - mpich # [unix] | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added this because Python must be 3.11+ since pyAMReX 26.03 (https://github.com/AMReX-Codes/pyamrex/releases/tag/26.03).
The previous commit e39f51f raised errors like the following:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This breaks the automatic rerendering, see from https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/24052856620/job/70152392549:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Trying the
skipdirective in recipe/recipe.yaml instead in 69ba436.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There should be a field python that can be used for min version in recipe
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. Maybe this will work:
Note this also removes duplicate entries (
pythonandpybind11).Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
python_min might usually need to go into the build config file in the root of the repo, would need to check
Oops, I deleted my comment with nice links into the CF knowledge base by accident.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I asked here:
https://conda-forge.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/457337-general/topic/Rerender.20w.2F.20Python.203.2E11.2B.20w.2F.20V1.20recipe/with/583886362
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On the other hand we had a lot of Python 3.10 builds in these PR's CI checks (see e39f51f), so I don't see how that's excluded by default. So we do need to do something about it, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes that makes sense. I thought CF had already migrated as in earlier versions