Skip to content

Remove reference to "black/white color blindness"#2895

Closed
jkshapiro wants to merge 1 commit intow3c:mainfrom
jkshapiro:patch-1
Closed

Remove reference to "black/white color blindness"#2895
jkshapiro wants to merge 1 commit intow3c:mainfrom
jkshapiro:patch-1

Conversation

@jkshapiro
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not clear what that even is.

Also, a relative contrast of 3:1 is either good enough or it isn't. There is a usability benefit to underlining links, since that's the standard way of doing things, but it's disingenuous to say that 3:1 is insufficient for distinguishing links from surrounding text.

Not clear what that even is.

Also, a relative contrast of 3:1 is either good enough or it isn't. There is a usability benefit to underlining links, since that's the standard way of doing things, but it's disingenuous to say that 3:1 is insufficient for distinguishing links from surrounding text.
@JAWS-test
Copy link
Copy Markdown

JAWS-test commented Jan 5, 2023

I think, black/white color blindness means that no colors are seen at all (i.e. only black, white and all shades of gray in between). This is different from e.g. the widespread red-green blindness, where only red and green tones cannot be distinguished.

I don't mind deleting the mention of black/white color blindness here, because it's really not crucial for the recommendation to underline links.

However, I am strongly against deleting the whole sentence because it is very important. 3:1 contrast to fulfillment of SC is only an exception and not optimal. Especially links in running text that contrast only 3:1 from the text are hard to distinguish even for people without visual impairments (if the text color is e.g. gray and black) as you can see at https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/Techniques/working-examples/G183/link-contrast.html.

@ollie-iterators
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ollie-iterators commented Jan 5, 2023

You could change black/white color blindness to achromatic, or achromatopsia. A person who has achromatopsia can only see things as black and white or in shades of gray.

@jkshapiro jkshapiro closed this Jan 5, 2023
@jkshapiro jkshapiro deleted the patch-1 branch January 5, 2023 15:41
jkshapiro added a commit to jkshapiro/wcag that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2023
How about this?

Could also replace "black/white color blindness" with "achromatopsia" as suggested at w3c#2895 (comment), but the guidance applies equally for anyone in low-contrast environments e.g. on their cellphones in bright sunlight. The proposed text is disability-agnostic.
@GreggVan
Copy link
Copy Markdown

GreggVan commented Jan 6, 2023 via email

@jkshapiro
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jkshapiro commented Jan 6, 2023

Red/green colour blindness is called that because people with that condition have difficulty distinguishing between red and green. Similarly blue/yellow colour blindness. There really isn't such a thing as black/white colour blindness, unless you're referring to ordinary blindness.

The term "complete colour blindness" might fit the bill. But I don't think we need to refer to colour blindness at all. Check out #2899 for a revised proposal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants