Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
I synced this branch today while looking through old PRs, which required resolving conflicts:
See df64f09e for what was in the original commit of this PR. |
Co-authored-by: Scott O'Hara <scottaohara@users.noreply.github.com>
…nk text Co-authored-by: Scott O'Hara <scottaohara@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Discussed on backlog call 5/16. We did not resolve if "each landmark region" was equivalent to "same type of landmark". |
Co-authored-by: Kenneth G. Franqueiro <kfranqueiro@users.noreply.github.com>
mbgower
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There seems to be a bit of friction between how "name" is used in this document. There is also inconsistency with how "label" and "accessible name" are used. I am making some suggestions to try to improve.
spelled labeling with only one L not two together (which I think is American usage?) Changed the first use of "label" to "name" to try to better tie in the idea that one typically provides an accessible name for a region through use of an aria label technique.
|
@mbgower to copy over phrase |
|
We also need to update lines 49 and 51 in Example 1, as they are not handled as landmarks (missing acc name), even though the title suggests otherwise. |
|
Despite the few thumbs up, there seems to be sufficient support in the comments for this update to technique language. |
Fixes #919
Also:
role=application(no landmark region)role=region