This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 16, 2026. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 393
req_fsm: Always run vcl_synth upon client req reset #4412
Open
dridi
wants to merge
3
commits into
varnishcache:master
Choose a base branch
from
dridi:req_reset_synth
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+29
−14
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not understand this. The only place where
req_resetis set,VCL_RET_FAILhandling is signaled. Why does this pivot aroundreq_resetand notVCL_RET_FAILas already seems to be the case?Also, is
vcl_synth{}still the right place for this? Do we need some place to handleVCL_RET_FAIL, where it is clear that we do not emit headers?I do not want to say that this is wrong, but could you please at least explain more?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
req_poll()function is a short-circuit to circumvent VCL execution once a request is "reset". For now, that is limited to aborted h2 connections or h2 streams being reset (and again, #3835 and more on the enterprise side).The goal is to ensure that this short circuit either emulates a
return (fail)that normally leads tovcl_synth(viaR_STP_VCLFAIL) but does not preventvcl_synthfrom being executed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not understand how your response would answer my questions.
why does this (need to) look at
req_resetand not just atVCL_RET_FAIL?Would it not be cleaner to have a vcl sub to handle
VCL_RET_FAILrather than invokingvcl_synth {}, but without the intended effect? The existing code path invcl_synth {}is to handle areturn(fail)fromvcl_synth {}itself, but now enteringvcl_synth {}for fail paths and not executing the expected delivery seems plain wrong to me.Side note: We should base our design decisions on what we have in our code base. What is in your private fork should not guide us.