Skip to content

docs(features): Add scheduling priority reference#103

Open
JeromeJaggi wants to merge 1 commit intoprod-stagingfrom
docs/scheduling-priority
Open

docs(features): Add scheduling priority reference#103
JeromeJaggi wants to merge 1 commit intoprod-stagingfrom
docs/scheduling-priority

Conversation

@JeromeJaggi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Add new scheduling priority feature page documenting the 4 priority levels, schedprio_policy API field, permissions, and startup boost behavior

Files changed

  • pages/features/scheduling.mdx (new)

Comment thread pages/features/scheduling.mdx Outdated
| `high` | 2 | High priority. |
| `admin` | 3 | Highest assignable priority. |

On a lightly loaded host, priority has little effect because all instances get the CPU time they need.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ [vale] reported by reviewdog 🐶
[Microsoft.Adverbs] Remove 'lightly' if it's not important to the meaning of the statement.

Comment thread pages/features/scheduling.mdx Outdated
## Permissions

Setting `schedprio_policy` requires the `override_vm_priority` permission on the user account.
Without this permission, the field is silently ignored and the instance uses the default `normal` priority.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ [vale] reported by reviewdog 🐶
[Microsoft.Adverbs] Remove 'silently' if it's not important to the meaning of the statement.

@JeromeJaggi JeromeJaggi force-pushed the docs/scheduling-priority branch from f4d392a to 769970d Compare March 31, 2026 18:59
Signed-off-by: Jerome Jaggi <jerome@unikraft.io>
@JeromeJaggi JeromeJaggi force-pushed the docs/scheduling-priority branch from 769970d to c61ed2a Compare April 3, 2026 14:20
@github-actions github-actions Bot temporarily deployed to pull-requests April 3, 2026 14:23 Inactive
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants