revbump({x11,root}): for boost 1.89.0

[robertkirkman]

• Part 2 of bump(main/boost): 1.89.0 #25882

• Please refer to the PR description of part 1 for the full explanation of the changes

[robertkirkman]

I will try to merge it quickly as soon as it finishes, because many of these packages could be broken in the repo until they are rebuilt using boost 1.89.0.

[robertkirkman]

Actually, I tested some packages and, all of them still seem to be working (without any boost-related errors), which is a bit surprising, and I didn't really know boost was this flexible.

inkscape most definitely is linked to libboost_filesystem.so, but it continues to work without recompiling, at first glance,

~ $ ldd $(which inkscape)
	libinkscape_base.so => /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/inkscape/libinkscape_base.so
	libglib-2.0.so.0 => /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
	libc.so => /system/lib64/libc.so
	libdl.so => /system/lib64/libdl.so
	libgiomm-2.4.so => /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/libgiomm-2.4.so
	libglibmm-2.4.so => /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/libglibmm-2.4.so
	libc++_shared.so => /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/libc++_shared.so
	libboost_filesystem.so => /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/lib/libboost_filesystem.so

however, I understand that it might be chance that some programs might be linked to parts of boost 1.87 that are coincidentally ABI-compatible with boost 1.89, and they should all still be revision-bumped, because Arch Linux does, so that could mean that there could definitely be ABI differences between versions of certain boost shared libraries, even if some of them are ABI-compatible. https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/inkscape/-/commit/53c89131b4da049d52644bc34406baacba6410a7