Expose measured force torque data#171
Open
thettasch-samxl wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An addition to expose the
measuredForcefield from theabb.egm.EgmRobotprotobuf message, to allow downstream code to read out the force-torque sensor data.The code should be compatible with both 6DOF and 1DOF sensors, although I have only been able to test it with a 6DOF sensor. Behaviour should remain unchanged if the
measuredForcefield is empty.I have already made the extra additions to abb_egm_rws_managers and abb_ros2 to allow the force torque data from a real robot with 6DOF FT sensor to be published by a standard ForceTorqueSensorBroadcaster. I will open PR's on those repositories once/if this change is accepted here.
Note: this is for external FT sensors, not for internal joint-torque measurements as discussed in #86.