Skip to content

CLN: Remove unnecessary .view(dtype) in nanops and take#65178

Closed
jbrockmendel wants to merge 3 commits intopandas-dev:mainfrom
jbrockmendel:ref-special-3
Closed

CLN: Remove unnecessary .view(dtype) in nanops and take#65178
jbrockmendel wants to merge 3 commits intopandas-dev:mainfrom
jbrockmendel:ref-special-3

Conversation

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Replace roundabout .astype("m8[ns]").view(dtype) and .astype("i8").view(dtype) patterns in _wrap_results and _mask_datetimelike_result with direct .astype(dtype) conversions
  • Use explicit np.datetime64/np.timedelta64 constructors for scalar results instead of .view() byte reinterpretation
  • In take.py _view_wrapper, replace hardcoded .astype("m8[ns]")/.astype("M8[ns]") with resolution-agnostic .view("i8")

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Replace roundabout .astype("m8[ns]").view(dtype) and .astype("i8").view(dtype)
patterns with direct .astype(dtype) conversions in _wrap_results and
_mask_datetimelike_result. Use explicit np.datetime64/np.timedelta64 constructors
for scalar results instead of .view() byte reinterpretation.

In take.py _view_wrapper, replace hardcoded .astype("m8[ns]")/.astype("M8[ns]")
with resolution-agnostic .view("i8").

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
jbrockmendel and others added 2 commits April 11, 2026 14:55
…uctors

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ravarnax ravarnax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm currently learning about the performance trade-offs in pandas internals. Could you help me understand why astype() is preferred over the previous astype("i8").view() approach here? Is it primarily for code clarity, or does it also handle edge cases with different datetime resolutions more safely?

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

In this context it doesn't make a perf difference, just a simplifying for its own sake

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the ref-special-3 branch April 20, 2026 20:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants