Fix SQL macros parser handling and add coverage#220
Closed
Gimyoonsoo wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
/claim #71
Summary
node-sql-parseroutput in the SQL macros plugin so single-statement parses and multi-statement parses are handled consistently.preventSelectStarguard for singleSELECT *statements, which were previously allowed whenastify()returned an object instead of an array.SELECT *rejection, admin exception, and$_exclude(...)expansion.Verification
node_modules\.bin\vitest.exe run plugins\sql-macros\index.test.tsnode_modules\.bin\prettier.exe --check plugins\sql-macros\index.ts plugins\sql-macros\index.test.tsgit diff --checknode_modules\.bin\vitest.exe run; it still fails in existingsrc/rls/index.test.tsassertions, with this new SQL macros test file passing in that run.