Skip to content

Update python_sdk to version v1.23.0 against stable - #10333

Open
opsmill-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
stablefrom
stable-python_sdk-v1.23.0
Open

Update python_sdk to version v1.23.0 against stable#10333
opsmill-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
stablefrom
stable-python_sdk-v1.23.0

Conversation

@opsmill-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR updates the submodule python_sdk to version v1.23.0.

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 issue found across 1 file

Confidence score: 5/5

  • python_sdk includes feature and behavior changes in the editable-bundled SDK, including dropping unknown schema fields and changing write defaults, which could affect compatibility for existing consumers; validate these changes with targeted regression tests.
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)

Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.


<file name="python_sdk">

<violation number="1" location="python_sdk:1">
P3: This bump ships product features (new `infrahubctl schema format`, IPAddress kind, task-manager retry/cancel) and behavior changes to the editable-bundled SDK (schema models now drop unknown fields; write defaults change so programmatically-built schema round-trip output changes) on the `stable` base branch. Per the base-branch policy, a product feature (not a pure fix) targeting stable should be called out as a low-severity note: confirm this is an intentional hotfix path rather than an accidental stable merge. Non-blocking.</violation>
</file>

Shadow auto-approve: would not auto-approve because issues were found.

Re-trigger cubic

Comment thread python_sdk
@@ -1 +1 @@
Subproject commit db6e0c7f6352b03ca6e27c75da11192b4ef24c3d
Subproject commit 99a380ac145cb549687bc2b8030cf5edf2f5a492

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P3: This bump ships product features (new infrahubctl schema format, IPAddress kind, task-manager retry/cancel) and behavior changes to the editable-bundled SDK (schema models now drop unknown fields; write defaults change so programmatically-built schema round-trip output changes) on the stable base branch. Per the base-branch policy, a product feature (not a pure fix) targeting stable should be called out as a low-severity note: confirm this is an intentional hotfix path rather than an accidental stable merge. Non-blocking.

Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At python_sdk, line 1:

<comment>This bump ships product features (new `infrahubctl schema format`, IPAddress kind, task-manager retry/cancel) and behavior changes to the editable-bundled SDK (schema models now drop unknown fields; write defaults change so programmatically-built schema round-trip output changes) on the `stable` base branch. Per the base-branch policy, a product feature (not a pure fix) targeting stable should be called out as a low-severity note: confirm this is an intentional hotfix path rather than an accidental stable merge. Non-blocking.</comment>

<file context>
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Subproject commit db6e0c7f6352b03ca6e27c75da11192b4ef24c3d
+Subproject commit 99a380ac145cb549687bc2b8030cf5edf2f5a492
</file context>

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 13 untouched benchmarks


Comparing stable-python_sdk-v1.23.0 (bf74bb2) with stable (0cb07cb)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on stable (85201d8) during the generation of this report, so 0cb07cb was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant