Skip to content

OCPBUGS-82973: align frr-k8s 25/3/2026#2945

Open
oribon wants to merge 4 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
oribon:frrk8s_tls_manifests
Open

OCPBUGS-82973: align frr-k8s 25/3/2026#2945
oribon wants to merge 4 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
oribon:frrk8s_tls_manifests

Conversation

@oribon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@oribon oribon commented Mar 25, 2026

Aligning the frr-k8s manifests with openshift/frr#128, the 2 major changes are:

  • frr-k8s no longer uses kube-rbac-proxy but rather exposes the https endpoints directly, aligning the bits with upstream
  • new crd introduced
    the 2 other commits are for e2e passing downstream, as upstream has these assumptions already baked in

frr-k8s no longer uses kube-rbac-proxy, but instead
exposes the TLS endpoints directly.
The TLS parameters (fed by OCP TLS Profile) should be
passed as flags to the frr-k8s binaries, to be done
in a seperate commit.

Signed-off-by: Ori Braunshtein <obraunsh@redhat.com>
Assisted-by: Cursor
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 25, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (1)
  • do-not-merge/work-in-progress

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 29807521-515d-4d4c-915b-0855a336f18f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 25, 2026
@oribon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oribon commented Mar 25, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/frrk8s-e2e openshift/frr#128

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from arghosh93 and kyrtapz March 25, 2026 17:23
oribon added 2 commits March 25, 2026 19:38
Signed-off-by: Ori Braunshtein <obraunsh@redhat.com>
We have e2es that rely on the poll-interval being low,
here we add a support to modify it through the configmap,
to be set by CI lanes.

Signed-off-by: Ori Braunshtein <obraunsh@redhat.com>
Assisted-by: Cursor
@oribon oribon force-pushed the frrk8s_tls_manifests branch from 9655f93 to 85820d3 Compare March 29, 2026 18:26
@oribon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oribon commented Mar 30, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/frrk8s-e2e openshift/frr#128

@andreaskaris
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I didn't do a super thorough review. however subject to passing
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 30, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 30, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andreaskaris, oribon
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jcaamano for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 30, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 30, 2026

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@andreaskaris
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/frrk8s-e2e openshift/frr#128

We missed this binary when introducing the configmap

Signed-off-by: Ori Braunshtein <obraunsh@redhat.com>

 Changes to be committed:
@oribon oribon force-pushed the frrk8s_tls_manifests branch from 4ebf872 to f9c3dc6 Compare March 31, 2026 07:42
@oribon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oribon commented Mar 31, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/frrk8s-e2e openshift/frr#128

@oribon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oribon commented Mar 31, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp openshift/frr#128

@oribon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oribon commented Mar 31, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw openshift/frr#128

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 31, 2026

@oribon: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-ovn-ipsec-step-registry f9c3dc6 link true /test e2e-ovn-ipsec-step-registry
ci/prow/security f9c3dc6 link false /test security
ci/prow/4.22-upgrade-from-stable-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade f9c3dc6 link false /test 4.22-upgrade-from-stable-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp f9c3dc6 link true /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp
ci/prow/frrk8s-e2e f9c3dc6 link false /test frrk8s-e2e
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2 f9c3dc6 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-rhcos10-techpreview f9c3dc6 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-rhcos10-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw f9c3dc6 link true /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@oribon oribon changed the title WIP: align frr-k8s align frr-k8s 25/3/2026 Mar 31, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 31, 2026
@oribon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oribon commented Mar 31, 2026

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 31, 2026
@fedepaol
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

fedepaol commented Apr 1, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/frrk8s-e2e openshift/frr#128

@fedepaol
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

fedepaol commented Apr 1, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp

@fedepaol
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

fedepaol commented Apr 1, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp openshift/frr#128

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 1, 2026

@fedepaol, testwith: Error processing request. ERROR:

could not determine job runs: invalid format for additional PR: openshift/frr#128https://github.com/openshift/frr/pull/128

@fedepaol
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

fedepaol commented Apr 1, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp openshift/frr#128

@fedepaol
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

fedepaol commented Apr 1, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw openshift/frr#128

@fedepaol
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

fedepaol commented Apr 8, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp openshift/frr#128

@fedepaol
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw openshift/frr#128

1 similar comment
@oribon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oribon commented Apr 13, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw openshift/frr#128

@oribon oribon changed the title align frr-k8s 25/3/2026 OCPBUGS-82973: align frr-k8s 25/3/2026 Apr 13, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 13, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@oribon: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82973, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Aligning the frr-k8s manifests with openshift/frr#128, the 2 major changes are:

  • frr-k8s no longer uses kube-rbac-proxy but rather exposes the https endpoints directly, aligning the bits with upstream
  • new crd introduced
    the 2 other commits are for e2e passing downstream, as upstream has these assumptions already baked in

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@oribon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oribon commented Apr 14, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw openshift/frr#128

3 similar comments
@oribon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oribon commented Apr 14, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw openshift/frr#128

@oribon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oribon commented Apr 14, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw openshift/frr#128

@oribon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oribon commented Apr 15, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw openshift/frr#128

@oribon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oribon commented Apr 15, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw openshift/frr#128

tried multiple times to run the localgw lane, it seems it has regressed with a lot of unrelated failures. the last couple of times didn't have any fail related to frr-k8s (I think), this is the last decent run (apr 13) https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/multi-pr-openshift-cluster-network-operator-2945-openshift-frr-128-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw/2043598631876956160

@oribon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oribon commented Apr 15, 2026

/testwith openshift/cluster-network-operator/master/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw openshift/frr#128

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants