Optimize replicaset informers - DNM#1123
Conversation
|
/hold |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1123 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 67.06% 67.04% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 121 121
Lines 7664 7666 +2
==========================================
Hits 5140 5140
- Misses 2187 2189 +2
Partials 337 337
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@jotak: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Description
Ignores all inactive replicasets; potentially improving a lot memory usage on large clusters
do not merge yet , see dependencies
We need to see if the upstream fix will be backported or not. If not, we should perhaps introduce a flag or a mechanism to turn on/off this optimization, so that it doesn't break the replicasets informer when running against a non-patched cluster.
Dependencies
Checklist
If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.
To run a perfscale test, comment with:
/test flp-node-density-heavy-25nodes