feat: Add exclude as a complement to exclude.

[evantrimboli]

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• The commit message follows our guidelines: https://github.com/nestjs/nest/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

[ ] Bugfix
[x] Feature
[ ] Code style update (formatting, local variables)
[ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
[ ] Build related changes
[ ] CI related changes
[ ] Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

#1288

Issue Number: 1288

What is the new behavior?

exclude works as a complement to include.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

[ ] Yes
[x] No

Other information

[sgrigorev]

@evantrimboli I would grateful if you would resolve conflicts to push it further. I also need this feature 🙂

[jmcdo29]

The code here looks solid. If we can get the conflicts resolved I could see this being useful.

[evantrimboli]

Upon reflection I think this PR doesn't make sense as-is. I think it would be better to alter the type of include to:

type IncludeFn = (module: Function) => boolean;
include?: IncludeFn | Function[];

[jmcdo29]

Upon reflection I think this PR doesn't make sense as-is. I think it would be better to alter the type of include to:

type IncludeFn = (module: Function) => boolean;
include?: IncludeFn | Function[];

Oh, even better with less complexity. I'm game for that

[bryan-gc]

Was this included on another PR or it was abandoned?

[SnowMarble]

Is it ready to merge after resolving the conflicts?

[kamilmysliwiec]

Upon reflection I think this PR doesn't make sense as-is. I think it would be better to alter the type of include to:

Yeah I agree

[1nVitr0]

What's the status of this?

[evantrimboli]

I added an updated PR here: #3759