Skip to content

chore(deps): update eslint monorepo to v9.39.4#621

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/eslint-monorepo
Open

chore(deps): update eslint monorepo to v9.39.4#621
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/eslint-monorepo

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
@eslint/js (source) 9.39.29.39.4 age confidence
eslint (source) 9.39.29.39.4 age confidence

Release Notes

eslint/eslint (@​eslint/js)

v9.39.4

Compare Source

v9.39.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

  • 791bf8d fix: restore TypeScript 4.0 compatibility in types (#​20504) (sethamus)

Chores

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.39.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

Documentation

Chores

v9.39.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

  • 791bf8d fix: restore TypeScript 4.0 compatibility in types (#​20504) (sethamus)

Chores


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 4am on the first day of the month"
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from c949973 to 60c12e6 Compare May 18, 2026 11:13
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-monorepo branch from 60c12e6 to 04c9067 Compare May 28, 2026 16:42
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-monorepo branch from 04c9067 to 7ff746d Compare June 1, 2026 23:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants