Skip to content

Update arrow-adbc port#51144

Draft
IIFE wants to merge 1 commit intomicrosoft:masterfrom
IIFE:arrow-adbc-update
Draft

Update arrow-adbc port#51144
IIFE wants to merge 1 commit intomicrosoft:masterfrom
IIFE:arrow-adbc-update

Conversation

@IIFE
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@IIFE IIFE commented Apr 13, 2026

Windows build support has been added to arrow-adbc as part of this PR:
apache/arrow-adbc#2858

arrow is not needed as a dependency for core arrow-adbc, mainly nanoarrow.

Patches no longer needed as a result of new changes to arrow-adbc from above PR.

  • Changes comply with the maintainer guide.
  • SHA512s are updated for each updated download.
  • The "supports" clause reflects platforms that may be fixed by this new version, or no changes were necessary.
  • Any fixed CI baseline and CI feature baseline entries are removed from that file, or no entries needed to be changed.
  • All patch files in the port are applied and succeed.
  • The version database is fixed by rerunning ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committing the result.
  • Exactly one version is added in each modified versions file.

@IIFE
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

IIFE commented Apr 13, 2026

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

@BillyONeal
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There appear to be a number of legitimate feature test failures for that port; I'm not sure whether that's a change vs. the status quo though. Please investigate whether those are expected failures on the part of the port (in which case those features should probably be guarded with a "supports" expression), or unexpected (in which case they probably need arrow-adbc[that feature]:that triplet=feature-fails added to scripts/ci.feature.baseline.txt)

Thanks for the update submission!

@BillyONeal BillyONeal marked this pull request as draft April 13, 2026 22:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants