Skip to content

feat: STORIF-330: refactored handling of Quotas. Introduced a service defin…#13557

Open
skulpok-akamai wants to merge 1 commit intolinode:developfrom
skulpok-akamai:feature/storif-330
Open

feat: STORIF-330: refactored handling of Quotas. Introduced a service defin…#13557
skulpok-akamai wants to merge 1 commit intolinode:developfrom
skulpok-akamai:feature/storif-330

Conversation

@skulpok-akamai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@skulpok-akamai skulpok-akamai commented Apr 3, 2026

…ition that allows to quickly introduce new services. Added service selector.

Description 📝

This PR adds a service selector to the Quotas page. It also drastically refactors Quota components in preparation of adding a new service for Volume quotas. Due to the fact that the quota endpoint don't follow a shared pattern, services are highly configurable now, which should make adding new services much less painfull.

Changes 🔄

List any change(s) relevant to the reviewer.

  • added a service selector
  • refactored quota components
  • improved quota table rendering (quota data is being rendered as soon as it's ready).

Scope 🚢

Upon production release, changes in this PR will be visible to:

  • All customers
  • Some customers (e.g. in Beta or Limited Availability)
  • No customers / Not applicable

Target release date 🗓️

4/29

Preview 📷

Include a screenshot <img src="" /> or video <video src="" /> of the change.

🔒 Use the Mask Sensitive Data setting for security.

💡 For changes requiring multiple steps to validate, prefer a video for clarity.

Before After

|
image
|
image
|

How to test 🧪

Prerequisites

  1. Enable object storage (create bucket or an access key)
  2. Navigate to Administration -> Quotas
Author Checklists

As an Author, to speed up the review process, I considered 🤔

👀 Doing a self review
❔ Our contribution guidelines
🤏 Splitting feature into small PRs
➕ Adding a changeset
🧪 Providing/improving test coverage
🔐 Removing all sensitive information from the code and PR description
🚩 Using a feature flag to protect the release
👣 Providing comprehensive reproduction steps
📑 Providing or updating our documentation
🕛 Scheduling a pair reviewing session
📱 Providing mobile support
♿ Providing accessibility support


  • I have read and considered all applicable items listed above.

As an Author, before moving this PR from Draft to Open, I confirmed ✅

  • All tests and CI checks are passing
  • TypeScript compilation succeeded without errors
  • Code passes all linting rules

@skulpok-akamai skulpok-akamai force-pushed the feature/storif-330 branch 18 times, most recently from bb970f4 to 758d7b8 Compare April 7, 2026 15:50
@skulpok-akamai skulpok-akamai marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2026 15:50
@skulpok-akamai skulpok-akamai requested review from a team as code owners April 7, 2026 15:50
@skulpok-akamai skulpok-akamai requested review from jdamore-linode and removed request for a team April 7, 2026 15:50
@skulpok-akamai skulpok-akamai force-pushed the feature/storif-330 branch 5 times, most recently from 1aa9b45 to eae49c6 Compare April 8, 2026 09:45
@skulpok-akamai skulpok-akamai force-pushed the feature/storif-330 branch 2 times, most recently from 7fdf3b3 to 134b2a2 Compare April 8, 2026 10:42
…hat allows to quickly introduce new services. Added service selector.
@linode-gh-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Cloud Manager UI test results

🔺 2 failing tests on test run #29 ↗︎

❌ Failing✅ Passing↪️ Skipped🕐 Duration
2 Failing900 Passing11 Skipped44m 22s

Details

Failing Tests
SpecTest
object-storage-summary-page.spec.tsCloud Manager Cypress Tests→Object storage summary page test » should display table with user quotas
object-storage.e2e.spec.tsCloud Manager Cypress Tests→object storage end-to-end tests » can update bucket access

Troubleshooting

Use this command to re-run the failing tests:

pnpm cy:run -s "cypress/e2e/core/objectStorage/object-storage-summary-page.spec.ts,cypress/e2e/core/objectStorage/object-storage.e2e.spec.ts"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants