Skip to content

tapdb: make mssmt node inserts idempotent#2118

Open
jtobin wants to merge 1 commit into
lightninglabs:mainfrom
jtobin:issue2116
Open

tapdb: make mssmt node inserts idempotent#2118
jtobin wants to merge 1 commit into
lightninglabs:mainfrom
jtobin:issue2116

Conversation

@jtobin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jtobin jtobin commented May 1, 2026

Fixes #2116.

Add ON CONFLICT (hash_key, namespace) DO NOTHING to InsertBranch, InsertLeaf, and InsertCompactedLeaf. In a Merkle tree, identical hashes guarantee identical content, so ignoring duplicates is correct. This fixes UNIQUE constraint violations when tree operations produce nodes whose hashes already exist in the table.

Add ON CONFLICT (hash_key, namespace) DO NOTHING to InsertBranch,
InsertLeaf, and InsertCompactedLeaf. In a Merkle tree, identical
hashes guarantee identical content, so ignoring duplicates is
correct. This fixes UNIQUE constraint violations when tree
operations produce nodes whose hashes already exist in the table.

Fixes lightninglabs#2116.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces idempotency to the MSSMT node insertion process by handling potential unique constraint conflicts gracefully. By ignoring duplicate entries for existing hash keys within the same namespace, the system ensures stability during tree operations that might otherwise trigger errors when encountering pre-existing nodes.

Highlights

  • Idempotent Node Insertion: Added ON CONFLICT (hash_key, namespace) DO NOTHING clauses to all MSSMT node insertion queries to prevent unique constraint violations.
  • SQL Query Updates: Updated both the raw SQL query definitions and the generated Go code to reflect the new conflict handling strategy.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the MSSMT node insertion queries (InsertBranch, InsertLeaf, and InsertCompactedLeaf) to include an ON CONFLICT (hash_key, namespace) DO NOTHING clause. This change ensures that duplicate insertions do not trigger errors, effectively making the insertion operations idempotent. I have no further feedback to provide.

@lightninglabs-deploy
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Roasbeef: review reminder
@jtobin, remember to re-request review from reviewers when ready

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: 🆕 New

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Non-Idempotent Inserts in SQL-Backed MS-SMT

2 participants