Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If the repository mantainers determine this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hdp617 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/test all |
|
@BenTheElder FYI |
|
/retest-required |
|
Is everything moved to kops now for this repo? Worth noting: We'll need cloud-provider-gcp to work with the original copy of these in github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes for the time-being, as the lift to shift everything to kops there is a much longer term project. I don't think that precludes dropping it here, but we may need some help keeping the cloud-provider functional there, since it underpins a significant fraction of K8s testing on GCP for the immediate future. |
|
/retest |
All presubmits have been moved to kops. The periodic tests are still using kubetest2-gce, but I'm planning to migrate those to kops soon as well.
Thanks for pointing this out. Keeping the CCM component on k/k up-to-date is part of our release process. We'll make sure it stays functional there. |
|
Awesome! 🎉 |
No description provided.