-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
PTA: Add chip to outputs and estimate signal-to-clutter ratio. #251
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
Tyler-g-hudson
wants to merge
6
commits into
isce-framework:develop
Choose a base branch
from
Tyler-g-hudson:pta_scr_and_chip
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ed0961f
Add chip magnitude and phase to PTA output, add a method for calculat…
Tyler-g-hudson c0811a4
Incorporate SCR estimation into analyze_point_target_chip
Tyler-g-hudson b685d98
Add a comment that explains why SCR is not estimated for geocoded pro…
Tyler-g-hudson 9cf3e0a
Fix some errors and inconsistencies revealed by tests:
Tyler-g-hudson f0a192e
Correct peak magnitude estimation
Tyler-g-hudson 9914af5
Small documentation fix
Tyler-g-hudson File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't it be better to define it as fraction of the half input chip size?
Or alternatively, set the default to
Noneand determine its value based on input chip rather than setting it to absolute value which may not work for smaller chirp size than 32.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is something I hoped to discuss in PR review - my understanding of the push-and-pull affecting this parameter is that it should be wide enough to capture a reasonable cross-section of the clutter while not being so large that it captures terrain-related variation in magnitude, per an offline discussion with @bhawkins.
With the above having been said, it's not obvious to me that varying SCR estimation chip size by the broader PTA chip is the right method unless the PTA chip is pretty small relative to the optimal SCR estimation chip, which makes this analysis harder to do in general.
Maybe the better option is to acquire this chip from the SLC instead of the PTA chip, using the known offsets from PTA to select a clutter estimation chip directly from the SLC so we don't have to worry about edge cases like when the PTA chip is small.