-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
mem: add an MI300X-oriented HBM3 x64 interface #8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Basemism
wants to merge
1
commit into
staging
Choose a base branch
from
staging-basem/hbm3
base: staging
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -1258,6 +1258,146 @@ class HBM_2000_4H_1x64(DRAMInterface): | |
| two_cycle_activate = True | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class HBM3_MI300X_1x64(DRAMInterface): | ||
| # MI300X-oriented HBM3 channel interface. It maps one 64-bit HBM3 channel | ||
| # onto one side of gem5's two-interface HBMCtrl. MI300X has eight HBM3 | ||
| # stacks, each exposing 16 x64 channels, for 128 channels in total. | ||
| # | ||
| # This keeps the legacy gem5 HBM controller shape while setting the | ||
| # rate/capacity from AMD's public MI300X data sheet: | ||
| # (https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/instinct-tech-docs/data-sheets/amd-instinct-mi300x-data-sheet.pdf) | ||
| # AMD Instinct MI300X Accelerator data sheet: | ||
| # memory capacity: 192GB HBM3 | ||
| # memory bandwidth: 5.3TB/s max peak theoretical | ||
| # memory interface: 8192 bits | ||
| # memory clock: up to 5.2GT/s | ||
| # | ||
| # Timing values not published in the AMD data sheet are derived from the | ||
| # Ramulator 2.1.0 HBM3 model: | ||
| # https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/ramulator2/blob/main/python/ramulator/dram/hbm3.py | ||
| # org preset: HBM3_16Gb_8hi | ||
| # timing preset: HBM3_6400Mbps | ||
| # (MI300X is 12-high 16Gb; Ramulator has no 12-high org, so anchor to | ||
| # the 16Gb-die preset and set capacity via device_size below.) | ||
| # | ||
| # Clock domains. tCK/tBURST use gem5's data/2 burst clock (fixes 5.2GT/s | ||
| # bandwidth); command-spacing timings (tRP, tRCD, ...) are Ramulator nCK | ||
| # counts scaled by the CA-clock period tCK_CA = 4/5.2GT/s = 0.769231ns = | ||
| # 2*tCK. Scaling by tCK instead would halve every latency (non-physical). | ||
| # | ||
| # Using the MI300X 5.2 GT/s CA clock (vs the 6.4 GT/s Ramulator reference) | ||
| # is conservative: the slower clock stretches each cycle by 6.4/5.2. | ||
|
|
||
| device_bus_width = 64 | ||
|
|
||
| burst_length = 8 | ||
|
|
||
| # AMD MI300X data sheet: 192GB HBM3. 192 GiB / 128 pseudo-channels | ||
| # = 1.5 GiB per pseudo-channel. | ||
| device_size = "1536MiB" | ||
|
|
||
| # Row buffer is halved for the pseudo-channel: 2 KiB / 2 = 1 KiB. | ||
| device_rowbuffer_size = "1KiB" | ||
|
|
||
| # One x64 device supplies this modeled channel. | ||
| devices_per_rank = 1 | ||
|
|
||
| # HBM-style stack interface, modelled as one rank like the existing HBM | ||
| # classes in gem5. | ||
| ranks_per_channel = 1 | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3_16Gb_8hi: sid=2, bankgroup=4, bank=4. gem5 lacks Sid, | ||
| # so flatten Sid into banks: 2 * 4 * 4 = 32 banks. | ||
| banks_per_rank = 32 | ||
| # Ramulator HBM3_16Gb_8hi: bankgroup=4. | ||
| bank_groups_per_rank = 4 | ||
|
|
||
| # AMD MI300X data sheet: memory clock up to 5.2GT/s. tCK is gem5's data/2 | ||
| # burst clock: tCK = 2 / 5.2GT/s = 0.384615ns. The CA-clock period used to | ||
| # scale command-spacing timings below is tCK_CA = 4 / 5.2GT/s = 2 * tCK. | ||
| tCK = "0.384615ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3_6400Mbps: nRP=26 CK. Scaled by tCK_CA. | ||
| tRP = "20ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3_6400Mbps: nRCDRD=31 CK, nRCDWR=15 CK. Scaled by tCK_CA. | ||
| tRCD = "23.846154ns" | ||
| tRCD_WR = "11.538462ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3_6400Mbps: nCL=20 CK, nCWL=10 CK. Scaled by tCK_CA. | ||
| tCL = "15.384615ns" | ||
| tCWL = "7.692308ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3_6400Mbps: nRAS=45 CK. Scaled by tCK_CA. | ||
| tRAS = "34.615385ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # BL8 burst occupancy at tCK=0.384615ns: 4 * tCK. Delivers the MI300X | ||
| # 41.6 GB/s/pseudo-channel (64B burst / 1.538462ns = 5.2GT/s * 64bit). | ||
| tBURST = "1.538462ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3 resolves all-bank refresh from channel density | ||
| # (channel_density = die_density / sid). For the MI300X 16Gb-die stack | ||
| # (HBM3_16Gb_8hi: 16Gb / 2 = 8Gb channel density), Ramulator's | ||
| # _resolve_nRFC table gives tRFC = 350ns. | ||
| tRFC = "350ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # HBM3 refresh interval used by Ramulator HBM3 and the existing gem5 HBM | ||
| # classes. | ||
| tREFI = "3.9us" | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3_6400Mbps: nWR=33 CK. Scaled by tCK_CA. | ||
| tWR = "25.384615ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3_6400Mbps: nRTP=9 CK. Scaled by tCK_CA. | ||
| tRTP = "6.923077ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3_6400Mbps: nWTRS=7 CK, nWTRL=10 CK. Scaled by tCK_CA. | ||
| tWTR = "5.384615ns" | ||
| tWTR_L = "7.692308ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3_6400Mbps: nRTW=20 CK. Scaled by tCK_CA. | ||
| tRTW = "15.384615ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # HBM-style single-rank interface, following gem5's existing HBM classes. | ||
| tCS = "0ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3_6400Mbps: nCCDL=4 CK. Scaled by tCK_CA. | ||
| tCCD_L = "3.076923ns" | ||
| tCCD_L_WR = "3.076923ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3_6400Mbps: nRRDS=4 CK, nRRDL=5 CK. Scaled by tCK_CA. | ||
| tRRD = "3.076923ns" | ||
| tRRD_L = "3.846154ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3_6400Mbps: nFAW=24 CK and four activates per window. | ||
| # Scaled by tCK_CA. | ||
| tXAW = "18.461538ns" | ||
| activation_limit = 4 | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3_6400Mbps: nPPD=2 CK. Scaled by tCK_CA. | ||
| tPPD = "1.538462ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Ramulator HBM3 models ACT as a 1.5 CK row command. gem5 can only model | ||
| # two-cycle activate, so approximate the extra half CA cycle: 0.5 * tCK_CA. | ||
| two_cycle_activate = True | ||
| tAAD = "0.384615ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Not published in the AMD MI300X data sheet; use a conservative | ||
| # HBM-style powerdown exit of 4 CA cycles (4 * tCK_CA). | ||
| tXP = "3.076923ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Conservative self-refresh exit approximation: all-bank refresh plus | ||
| # powerdown exit (tRFC + tXP = 350 + 3.076923). | ||
| tXS = "353.076923ns" | ||
|
|
||
| # Existing gem5 HBM2 class uses close_adaptive for pseudo-channel HBM. | ||
| page_policy = "close_adaptive" | ||
|
|
||
| # Existing gem5 HBM2 pseudo-channel class uses 64-entry queues. | ||
| read_buffer_size = 64 | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @TomXia I know you also played with the read/write buffer sizes. What did you use as the defaults? |
||
| write_buffer_size = 64 | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| # A single HBM3 x64 pseudo-channel interface, anchored to | ||
| # JEDEC JESD238B.01 (April 2025). HBM3 introduces several | ||
| # changes over HBM2 that this preset captures: | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@TomXia I know you did some testing about open/close/adaptive for your work. What did you end up using for the default?