Repository navigation
Add pre-commit hook and composite action - #7
Open
biggdawg320 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
biggdawg320 wants to merge 1 commit into
biggdawg320 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #3.
Adds a reusable pre-commit hook and composite GitHub Action for the existing checker. Both preserve the distinction between a verified finding (exit 1) and NOT CHECKED (exit 2): findings fail the integration, while ordinary unmatched or unreadable files do not. Runtime failures still propagate from the Action.
Also adds the exit-code contract to the built-in self-test and documents both integrations in the README.
Validation run locally:
The composite shell path was exercised locally with Git Bash plus the host Python shim. It has not run on hosted GitHub Actions yet.
AI-assisted implementation under Jim Hall's direction; scope, validation, and submission were reviewed by the project workflow.