Skip to content

add: add get_report_exports GMP command support in gsad - #450

Merged
greenbonebot merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
add/get-report-exports
Sep 2, 2026
Merged

greenbonebot merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
add/get-report-exports

Conversation

@ozgen

@ozgen ozgen commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What

  • Add GSAD support for the get_report_exports GMP command.
  • Return the report export response to the client.

Why

  • GSAD needs to support the new get_report_exports command.

References

GEA-2041
depending on greenbone/gvmd#3113

@ozgen
ozgen requested review from a team as code owners September 2, 2026 13:16
@greenbonebot
greenbonebot enabled auto-merge (rebase) September 2, 2026 13:17
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.10%. Comparing base (15edc54) to head (2e216a2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #450   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.10%   95.10%           
=======================================
  Files          32       32           
  Lines        5091     5092    +1     
  Branches      144      144           
=======================================
+ Hits         4842     4843    +1     
  Misses        180      180           
  Partials       69       69           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 95.10% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@greenbonebot
greenbonebot merged commit 13ff5e6 into main Sep 2, 2026
18 of 19 checks passed
@greenbonebot
greenbonebot deleted the add/get-report-exports branch September 2, 2026 13:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants