Use quorum queues for higher reliability#317
Open
mdomke wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Martin Domke <martin.domke@finleap.com>
Contributor
Author
|
By the way: the |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As opposed to the use case of automatically generated, exclusive queues, a named queue should be as reliable as possible. For that reason, I added the durable queue option in #312. Since RabbitMQ 3.8 reliable HA queues are of type quorum which replace the legacy mirrored queues. This merge-request changes the options when creating named queues accordingly.
https://www.rabbitmq.com/quorum-queues.html