Add inverted and shifted hartmann benchmark#674
Conversation
AVHopp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Like the way this is going! Have some more ideas for further simplification
AVHopp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some comments related to parts of the design that I still do not fully agree with resp. understand
|
@Hrovatin any movement in this PR or should we close it? |
|
@Scienfitz still on my todo list to add your last two comments |
9efb03a to
2547819
Compare
Scienfitz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm, last comments but otherwise ready for merge
AVHopp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, only one general question and need a bit more time before I can approve
AVHopp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some minor comments on the docstrings and type hints. Other than that, everything is either flagged by the CI (type error in mypy) or opened as a comment.
229cd22 to
c500e7b
Compare
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Updated the docstring to clarify that the callable now shifts both dimensions and bounds for the Hartmann function.
Co-authored-by: Alexander V. Hopp <[email protected]>
c500e7b to
6b451d3
Compare
Add two new TL benchmarks:
@kalama-ai