Skip to content

Remove EnvelopeTemplate.defaultTimestampDocuments in favor of properties - #419

Merged
PavelVais merged 1 commit into
2.xfrom
dgs-4423-template-timestamp-cleanup
Aug 18, 2026
Merged

Remove EnvelopeTemplate.defaultTimestampDocuments in favor of properties#419
PavelVais merged 1 commit into
2.xfrom
dgs-4423-template-timestamp-cleanup

Conversation

@PavelVais

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow-up to #417 — review on the API MR concluded the default timestamp setting must live only on EnvelopeProperties, not as a new top-level field. The API keeps the deprecated top-level timestampDocuments alias until a follow-up ticket removes it.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The API keeps the default timestamp setting only on EnvelopeProperties;
the top-level EnvelopeTemplate field stays as the deprecated timestampDocuments alias.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.83%. Comparing base (f232e65) to head (7695c1f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                2.x     #419   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     97.83%   97.83%           
  Complexity      533      533           
=========================================
  Files            87       87           
  Lines          1246     1246           
=========================================
  Hits           1219     1219           
  Misses           27       27           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@PavelVais
PavelVais merged commit 6c3c4eb into 2.x Aug 18, 2026
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants