Close unterminated workflow tag in btca-local skill

[stickerdaniel]

Closes #227.

Line 40 of skills/btca-local/SKILL.md opened a second <workflow> instead of closing the block. This changes it to </workflow>.

Changes Made

• skills/btca-local/SKILL.md: Fixed unterminated workflow tag by replacing the erroneous <workflow> opening tag on line 40 with the correct </workflow> closing tag, ensuring the workflow block is properly closed and subsequent sections (end_goal and startup cases) are no longer incorrectly nested within it.

Note

Fix unterminated <workflow> tag in btca-local skill

Replaces a duplicate opening <workflow> tag with the correct closing </workflow> tag at the end of the workflow section in SKILL.md, making the markup well-formed.

^{Macroscope summarized 0359824.}

[vercel]

@stickerdaniel is attempting to deploy a commit to the davis7dotsh Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR corrects a single-line whitespace formatting issue in the BTCA Local skill workflow definition between the search step and the closing workflow tag. The change addresses markup structure consistency without altering logic or functionality.

Changes

BTCA Local Workflow Markup

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Workflow boundary whitespace adjustment skills/btca-local/SKILL.md	A single line of whitespace is adjusted at line 40 between the end of the search workflow step and the closing </workflow> tag to correct markup formatting.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: fixing an unterminated workflow tag in the btca-local skill by replacing an erroneous opening tag with a closing tag.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The code change directly addresses the requirement in issue #227 by replacing the erroneous tag on line 40 with to properly close the workflow block.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	The change is narrowly focused on fixing the specific markup issue in the workflow block as defined in issue #227, with no extraneous modifications.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}