Explore OPFS write-ahead VFS mode#176
Draft
marcus-pousette wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
storage.writeMode: 'opfs-write-ahead'for wa-sqliteOPFSWriteAheadVFS.Why
This tests a possible Chrome/OPFS path where multiple clients can open the same local SQLite file directly.
The practical fallback is SharedWorker single-owner OPFS: one worker owns SQLite/OPFS, and tabs connect to it. That avoids duplicate local copies and keeps multi-tab support, but adds a message hop through the SharedWorker.
OPFSWriteAheadVFSBenchmark Scope
This is single-active-tab throughput. It measures how one tab performs while using a runtime that can still support additional tabs.
Local Benchmark
Chromium dev project on an M1 Pro: