Improve top-level module guessing method in base runner class#8228
Merged
kbieganski merged 1 commit intochipsalliance:masterfrom Apr 20, 2026
Merged
Improve top-level module guessing method in base runner class#8228kbieganski merged 1 commit intochipsalliance:masterfrom
kbieganski merged 1 commit intochipsalliance:masterfrom
Conversation
|
|
Contributor
|
@wsnyder , @kbieganski, any chance we can get this merged? |
Contributor
|
@Arya-Golkari, can you rebase this as we now fixed the build failure on main. |
Contributor
Author
|
@tobiasgrosser I've now rebased; sorry for the delay. |
Contributor
Changes In Tests
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, the
BaseRunnermethodguess_top_modulejust greps for the first module in the file if the top-level module is not passed as a parameter. However, most tests follow a helpful naming convention: top-level modules are conveniently namedtop. This PR modifiesguess_top_moduleto exploit this pattern.This PR was motivated by "The force and release procedural statements" test, where the top-level module is currently guessed to be
flopinstead oftop. This has led CIRCT-Verilog to erroneously pass this test.I'd really appreciate help from reviewers! @fabianschuiki @kbieganski