-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 341
Consolidate trust logic into IsTrustedBuilder
#2573
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
runesoerensen
wants to merge
6
commits into
buildpacks:main
Choose a base branch
from
runesoerensen:runesoerensen/consolidate-trusted-builder-logic
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dbceb5f
Add failing test for `IsTrustedBuilder` not matching tagless known bu…
runesoerensen 85e15fc
Consolidate trust logic in IsTrustedBuilder with smart tag matching
runesoerensen 90e1d2a
Merge branch 'main' into runesoerensen/consolidate-trusted-builder-logic
jjbustamante 6bb75db
Apply smart matching to IsKnownTrustedBuilder
runesoerensen 3dc1da2
Add caller-level tests for tagged known trusted builders
runesoerensen fa3cc50
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into runesoerensen/consoli…
runesoerensen File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this test case reference:
paketobuildpacks/builder-jammy-base?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
:latesthere is intentional - this case exercises the "known entry has no tag, match any tag in the same repository" branch of the newname.ParseReferencelogic, which is what #2572 is about and is also the example shown in the Before/After in the PR description.The
heroku/builder:24case above covers the exact-tag branch. Switching to a barepaketobuildpacks/builder-jammy-basewould collapse this into a bare-vs-bare repository match and stop exercising the "any tag" path.Happy to expand the inline comment if it'd read more clearly, or add a second assertion with a different tag (e.g.
:anything) to make the "any tag" intent more obvious - let me know what you'd prefer (or if I'm missing something obvious :)).