[QA-250] Update QA metadata checks - #94
Draft
carly-jones wants to merge 11 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Author
|
Currently in draft until |
carly-jones
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 27, 2026 19:08
carly-jones
requested review from
DavidLFielding,
bdc34,
bmaltzan,
jweiskoff and
norbusan
as code owners
July 27, 2026 19:08
Author
|
Pin updated, ready for review |
Author
|
Putting back in draft as I update checks in |
carly-jones
marked this pull request as draft
July 28, 2026 20:33
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR replaces all imports of
arxiv.metadatawith imports from the updatedqapackage.This PR also lightly refactors to make QA-related unit tests less fragile. This is desired so that changes to a QA check's logic or
on_failure_policywill not break tests here.Notes
WARNorREJECTdisposition. This PR updates this to only block onREJECT, as currently desired by EUST.WARNmessages to the submitter, although this can easily be added in the future.