feat: support for arrays of mergeable objects in the “with” argument of “$merge”#15
Open
azaslavsky wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
feat: support for arrays of mergeable objects in the “with” argument of “$merge”#15azaslavsky wants to merge 1 commit into
azaslavsky wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Member
|
@azaslavsky Thank you, I will review |
|
Hello, I was looking for the fix to #12 and was wondering, is there an update on the PR review? |
Member
|
The fix to #12 is very simple, there is a separate PR for that. To support an array instead of a simple schema, there is no need to change the package completely. Instead of passing "json-merge-patch" package as is, you just need to pass a wrapper around this package that understands arrays. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a working implementation of the feature proposed in #14. It would also close #12.