Skip to content

NUT-20: harden mint quote signature + NUT-04 UUIDv7 quote ids#3

Merged
a1denvalu3 merged 1 commit into
a1denvalu3:fix-nut-29-batch-mintingfrom
robwoodgate:feat/mint-quote-sig-versions
May 31, 2026
Merged

NUT-20: harden mint quote signature + NUT-04 UUIDv7 quote ids#3
a1denvalu3 merged 1 commit into
a1denvalu3:fix-nut-29-batch-mintingfrom
robwoodgate:feat/mint-quote-sig-versions

Conversation

@robwoodgate

@robwoodgate robwoodgate commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Moves the NUT-29 domain-separated, length-framed, amount-committing msg_to_sign to NUT-20.
  • NUT-04quote ids MUST be a UUIDv7.
  • tests/20-test.md — hardened-message test vector.

Motivation

The legacy message doesn't commit output amounts and has ambiguous field boundaries across keyset curves. We chose a clean breaking change over a versioned migration because locked mint quotes have ~no production use and NUT-29 batch minting isn't fully released yet; wallets handle the transition as needed.

…7 quote ids

Replace the legacy `quote || B_0 || ... || B_(n-1)` mint-quote signature message
with a domain-separated, length-framed, amount-committing `msg_to_sign`. This is a
breaking change: mints no longer accept the legacy message. The message does not
commit the keyset `id`, so a wallet can re-target a rotated keyset without a new
signature.

- NUT-04: quote ids MUST be a UUIDv7.
- NUT-20: define the hardened `msg_to_sign` (replaces the concatenation).
- NUT-29: each locked quote is signed independently per NUT-20 over the
  consolidated outputs; mixed-method batches are rejected.
- tests/20-test.md: hardened-message test vector.
@robwoodgate robwoodgate changed the title NUT-20: harden mint quote signature (breaking) + NUT-04 UUIDv7 quote ids NUT-20: harden mint quote signature + NUT-04 UUIDv7 quote ids May 26, 2026
@robwoodgate robwoodgate marked this pull request as ready for review May 26, 2026 18:29
@a1denvalu3 a1denvalu3 merged commit 1225c9b into a1denvalu3:fix-nut-29-batch-minting May 31, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants