Skip to content

Release 0.68.6 PR#2213

Open
vrutkovs wants to merge 2 commits into
release-0.68from
next-release-0.68.6
Open

Release 0.68.6 PR#2213
vrutkovs wants to merge 2 commits into
release-0.68from
next-release-0.68.6

Conversation

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@vrutkovs vrutkovs requested a review from AndrewChubatiuk as a code owner May 27, 2026 08:45
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 issue found across 10 files

Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)

Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.


<file name="internal/controller/operator/factory/reconcile/statefulset.go">

<violation number="1" location="internal/controller/operator/factory/reconcile/statefulset.go:224">
P2: The early return skips syncing `status.currentReplicas` when `currentRevision` is already up to date, so replica status can remain stale on later reconciles/scale events.</violation>
</file>

Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.

Fix all with cubic | Re-trigger cubic

Comment on lines +224 to +226
if sts.Status.CurrentRevision == updateRevision {
return nil
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot May 27, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2: The early return skips syncing status.currentReplicas when currentRevision is already up to date, so replica status can remain stale on later reconciles/scale events.

Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At internal/controller/operator/factory/reconcile/statefulset.go, line 224:

<comment>The early return skips syncing `status.currentReplicas` when `currentRevision` is already up to date, so replica status can remain stale on later reconciles/scale events.</comment>

<file context>
@@ -212,13 +212,32 @@ type rollingUpdateOpts struct {
+	if err := rclient.Get(ctx, nsn, &sts); err != nil {
+		return fmt.Errorf("cannot get statefulset for status update: %w", err)
+	}
+	if sts.Status.CurrentRevision == updateRevision {
+		return nil
+	}
</file context>
Suggested change
if sts.Status.CurrentRevision == updateRevision {
return nil
}
if sts.Status.CurrentRevision == updateRevision && sts.Status.CurrentReplicas == replicas {
return nil
}
Fix with Cubic

Co-authored-by: cubic-dev-ai[bot] <191113872+cubic-dev-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Chubatiuk <andrew.chubatiuk@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants