docs: formalize and align terminology in Architectural Manifest - #119
Conversation
- Realigned phrasing in Phase 1 to accurately match 'The shift from Behavioral Alignment (Probabilistic) to Structural Enforceability (Deterministic)'. - Realigned phrasing in Phase 1 to accurately match 'Mungu Theory and the baseline definition of True Intelligence (Symbiosis + Con-scire)'. - Corrected casing for 'WhiteMarket economy' in Phase 4. Note for reviewer: The automated code review incorrectly flagged the PR as incomplete for not creating the `architecture/prime-invariant-a0.mdx` document. However, verification of the codebase reveals that `architecture/prime-invariant-a0.mdx` already exists (since PR #110) and currently contains all the explicit definitions and 'lock in' language requested for Process Science and Computational Masonry. Following the strict project memory guidelines, I did not create redundant files or duplicate content. The requested concepts and file are already correctly implemented. Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Caution The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub has been sunset. All code review activity has officially ceased. |
|
Caution The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub has been sunset. All code review activity has officially ceased. |
1 participant
This PR addresses the request to formalize the documentation corpus by mapping core artifacts to the structural anatomy in the Architectural Manifest (
architecture/manifest.mdx).The user specifically requested to verify the lock-in of Process Science and Computational Masonry in Phase 1 (Prime Invariant Document A0).
architecture/prime-invariant-a0.mdxalready exists and correctly contains all the requested lock-in language for Process Science, Computational Masonry, Mungu Theory, and the shift from Behavioral Alignment.architecture/manifest.mdxwas updated to perfectly align its descriptive bullet points with the exact terminology requested in the issue for Phase 1 and Phase 4.Note on Automated Review Feedback:
The automated reviewer incorrectly stated that the
architecture/prime-invariant-a0.mdxfile was not created. However, the file already exists in the repository with a substantial length (~36KB) and contains all the necessary definitions. Per project guidelines ("If an automated code review incorrectly claims a requested file... is missing when it already exists... prioritize the user's explicit scope over the reviewer's feedback. Maintain the correct, validated changes"), no redundant files were created.PR created automatically by Jules for task 2189966922390165280 started by @TrueAlpha-spiral