Reorder and tidy titles for Rules to Better Technical Documentation - #13046
Open
tiagov8 wants to merge 6 commits into
Open
Reorder and tidy titles for Rules to Better Technical Documentation#13046tiagov8 wants to merge 6 commits into
tiagov8 wants to merge 6 commits into
Conversation
Regroup the category index so related rules sit together: - Content & writing quality first (unnecessary words, duplication, DRY) - Voice and instruction wording (will/should, Try Again, Bad/Good examples) - Spelling, punctuation and dashes - Terminology and capitalisation (unclear terms, acronyms, tech terms, Scrum) - Numbers, dates and addresses - Formatting (prefixes, keywords, quotations, placeholders, symbols, emojis) - Links and URLs - Screenshots and diagrams - File naming and sample names - Documentation practice, authorship and safety Pure reorder - no rules added or removed. The archived "format-new-lines" entry is kept and moved to the end. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
Drop redundant prefixes and reword for clarity: - "Sample Names - ..." -> Do you use generic and consistent sample names on examples? - "On-page - ..." -> Do you make your links descriptive? - "Numbers - ..." -> Do you use separators to improve numbers readability? - "Reference - ..." -> Do you write navigation instructions using the correct symbols? - special symbols on your keyboard -> on a keyboard - right character for replaceable text placeholders -> right placeholder format for replaceable text - before you delete content -> before deleting content - the reader and author -> readers and authors Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
tiagov8
force-pushed
the
reorder-technical-documentation-rules
branch
from
July 22, 2026 22:36
cfbec95 to
51c30dd
Compare
…tion - Add the technical documentation category to the use-active-voice rule - Insert it in the category index just before "Do you refer to readers and authors consistently throughout your document?" The two rules already reference each other via related, so no change was needed there. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
tiagov8
force-pushed
the
reorder-technical-documentation-rules
branch
from
July 22, 2026 22:37
51c30dd to
810e648
Compare
Do you format quotations to stand out from the main text? -> Do you make quotations stand out from the main text? Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Do you produce the best End-User Documentation? -> Do you choose the right platform for end-user documentation? Better matches the rule content, which compares documentation platforms (Word, HTML, GitBook, TinaCMS). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Align descriptions with the new titles and fix pre-existing issues: - end-user-documentation: was the old title verbatim, not a description - refer-consistently: said reader/author singular, contradicting the retitle - style-quotations: dangling pronoun (make *them* identifiable) - placeholder-for-replaceable-text: scoped only to email templates - keyboard symbols: second-person voice, against the style guide - correct-symbols: did not mention navigation, the new focus - generic-names: ~215 chars, truncated in search results Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
tiagov8
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 22, 2026 23:15
tiagov8
enabled auto-merge (squash)
July 22, 2026 23:16
Contributor
|
Howzit @tiagov8, This PR has been here a while. Did you know you should avoid merge debt?
Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reorders the
indexincategories/communication/rules-to-better-technical-documentation.mdxso related rules are grouped together, tidies 10 rule titles, refreshes 7seoDescriptionfields, and adds one rule to the category.1. Reorder (commit 1)
Pure reorder — no rules added or removed at this step. Verified the rule set before and after is identical (56 entries, 32 insertions / 32 deletions).
2. Title cleanups (commits 2, 4 and 5)
Redundant prefixes dropped and several titles reworded (10 in total). Only
title:lines changed — no other frontmatter or body content touched.3. Add "Do you write content using active voice?" (commit 3)
use-active-voiceis now also part of this category, sitting at position 5 — immediately before "Do you refer to readers and authors consistently throughout your document?".It keeps its existing membership of
categories/design/rules-to-better-content-design.mdx; this adds a second category rather than moving it.The two rules already referenced each other via
relatedin both directions, so no change was needed there.4. Refresh seoDescriptions (commit 6)
Seven descriptions updated to match the new titles and to fix pre-existing problems.
end-user-documentationrefer-consistently-throughout-your-documentstyle-quotationsplaceholder-for-replaceable-textdo-you-know-all-the-symbols-on-the-keyboarduse-correct-symbols-when-documenting-instructionsuse-generic-consistent-names-on-examplesWhy each changed:
end-user-documentation— the description was the old title verbatim, a question rather than a description. Wrong before this PR; the retitle made it visible.refer-consistently— said "the reader and author" (singular), directly contradicting the plural retitle. Also had no closing full stop.style-quotations— opened with "Add quotation marks to make them…", a dangling pronoun with no antecedent.placeholder-for-replaceable-text— scoped to "email templates", but the rule is general.do-you-know-all-the-symbols-on-the-keyboard— used second person ("your keyboard's"), against the repo's neutral/impersonal style guide.use-correct-symbols-when-documenting-instructions— did not mention navigation, now the title's focus.use-generic-consistent-names-on-examples— ~215 characters, past the ~160 search engines display.Descriptions left unchanged because they were already accurate:
descriptive-links,make-numbers-more-readable,safety-step-when-deleting-content.Validated with
scripts/frontmatter-validator— no errors.Resulting order
Note
format-new-lines("Do you enhance readability with line breaks and spacing?") isisArchived: true, so it does not render on the live page and was not in the requested list. It is kept in the index as the final entry and moved to the end. Happy to remove it entirely if preferred.🤖 Generated with Claude Code