Corrected antisymmetric couplings for Granada models

[arossia94]

Update of the mass scan runcards for the tree-level matched models of the Granada collection with antisymmetric UV couplings (see JHEP 07 (2025) 136)

The models that suffered changes are:

• $S_1$ (Mod 3): the coupling $({y_{S_{1}}})_ {21}$ is antisymmetric and has been fixed to fulfil $({y_{S_{1}}})_ {21}=-({y_{S_{1}}})_ {12}$
• $\zeta$ (Mod 15): the coupling ${(y_{\zeta}^{qq})}_ {33}$ was removed due to not existing in the UV lagrangian due to being antisymmetric. The coupling $\left(y_\zeta^{q\ell}\right)_ {33}$ remains.
• $\omega_ 4$ (Mod 12): it has been removed since the only coupling that could generate tree-level operators within our flavor assumptions, $(y_ {\omega_ 4}^{uu})_ {33}$, needs to be antisymmetric and thus does not exist.
• $\Omega_ 1$ (Mod 16): same situation as for $\omega_ 4$, but with the coupling $(y_ {\Omega_ 1}^{qq})_ {33}$.

Additionally, I removed the FCCee cards for Models 11 and 13 which didn't generate anything at tree-level anyway.

[jacoterh]

Hi @arossia94, thanks for this. I found one inconsistency, see below. Please have a look. And why do you want to merge into update_cards_2l2q instead of main?