Skip to content

ci: enable Dependabot version updates for GitHub Actions - #54

Merged
swkeever merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
vol-1094-dependabot
Oct 7, 2026
Merged

swkeever merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
vol-1094-dependabot

Conversation

@swkeever

@swkeever swkeever commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Part of VOL-1094 (epic VOL-1077). volcano-skills had no Dependabot config, so its SHA-pinned actions only moved when someone bumped them by hand. This adds .github/dependabot.yml.

  • github-actions is the only ecosystem. The skills are Markdown, and scripts/ and tests/ use Node built-ins only, so there are no package manifests or lockfiles to watch.
  • Covers /, which is .github/workflows (there are no composite actions under .github/actions).
  • Runs weekly with open-pull-requests-limit: 5 and a 5-day cooldown (Actions supports default-days only).
  • Minor and patch updates are grouped into one PR, and each major gets its own PR.
  • Known Dependabot limitation: majors only get individual PRs on runs where the group has no open PR (dependabot-core#14202; the fix, #16113, is still open). Merging the group PR lets majors through. Upstream reports no config workaround, and the config comments say so.
  • Titles are ci(deps): …, matching the repo's Conventional Commits history.
  • Labels: this repo has no dependency labels, so labels: [] stops Dependabot creating its defaults.
  • Sync safety: volcano-agentic-plugins' sync-skills-from-source.mjs excludes .github/, so this file is never copied into the plugin skill folders and won't trip their drift check.

Status (read-only, not changed here)

  • Dependabot alerts and security updates are both enabled, with 0 open alerts.

Validation

  • check-jsonschema --schemafile https://json.schemastore.org/dependabot-2.0.json .github/dependabot.yml: ok.
  • Sample titles (ci(deps): bump the github-actions group with 2 updates, ci(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4.4.0 to 6.0.0) pass commitlint config-conventional.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 7, 2026 13:27

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@CLAassistant

CLAassistant commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@CLAassistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@swkeever

swkeever commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-07T14:00:40.058133Z 6885eb4 Manual request
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-07T14:01:24.773499Z 6885eb4 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: aed955de0a

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: aed955de0a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/dependabot.yml
@swkeever

swkeever commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🚀

Reviewed commit: 6885eb4d53

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6885eb4d53

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@swkeever
swkeever merged commit bc291a0 into main Oct 7, 2026
7 of 8 checks passed
@swkeever
swkeever deleted the vol-1094-dependabot branch October 7, 2026 14:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants