Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
32 changes: 32 additions & 0 deletions docs/exo3/REQUIREMENTS-MATRIX.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -95,6 +95,38 @@

---

## Canonical written-framework reconciliation (from *The Organizational Singularity* book + OpenExO resource hub — beyond the 11 videos) [added 2026-06-06, #2 due diligence]

The video-derived sections above (A, G) under-specified vs Salim's own WRITTEN structure. Canonical: **EXO 3.0 = MTP + DRIVE + SHAPE**, running on the **Intelligence Stack**, reached via the **REWRITE** 6-step playbook. Corrected mappings:

### A′. Intelligence Stack = SIX cognitive layers + a GOVERN/ASSURE control plane (section A listed 5)
| Canonical layer | Instar |
|---|---|
| **Purpose** (mission, constraints, priorities) | ORG-INTENT / MTP protocol (also section B) — it IS the Stack's first layer |
| Sense | sentinel family + monitoring |
| Interpret | CoherenceMonitor + classifiers |
| Decide | gates (external-operation, mandate, trust) + tradeoff-resolve |
| **Orchestrate & Act** (combined) | scheduler/jobs + SessionManager + multi-session/multi-machine |
| Learn | Playbook + learnings + correction/preference + learning-velocity |
| **GOVERN/ASSURE** (cross-cutting: real-time oversight, accountability, auditability, human stewardship) | **WE WERE UNDER-CLAIMING THIS.** guard-posture tripwire + decision audits (reaper-audit, operations log) + reap-log + coherence gate + attention-queue (human stewardship) + standards/constitution enforcement. A named requirement and one of our STRONGEST areas — foreground it. |

### G′. SHAPE = FIVE named dimensions (section G was generic)
| Canonical dimension | Instar |
|---|---|
| **Safe Autonomy** | external-operation-gate (classify/gate every external action) + secret-store-never-on-disk + source-tree-guard. (Exactly the OpenClaw "lethal-trifecta" failure we prevent.) |
| **Human Architecture** | human ON the loop (show-plan for high-risk) + operator-binding (Know Your Principal) + attention escalation |
| **Adaptive Architecture** | self-heal (compaction/restart-cascade/version-skew recovery) + graduated feature rollout |
| **Purpose Control** | coherence gate (every outbound message vs intent) + periodic drift audit |
| **Ecosystem Trust** | Threadline (trust-gated A2A) — the honest frontier, off by default — + mandate/passport |

### ★ The framework's biggest UNSTATED requirement = our strongest differentiation
A detailed analysis of the framework notes it describes *what to eliminate* (org charts, middle-management coordination, fixed planning cycles) but leaves its biggest requirement **unspecified**: *"continuous enforcement that agents remain aligned to MTP, with no mechanism described"* — also no drift audit, no named agent-misalignment-over-time failure mode, no stated human-oversight trigger. **We IMPLEMENT exactly this**: the coherence gate (every outbound vs intent), the periodic drift audit (gradual "Klarna-style" wandering), per-component auditability, and show-plan/attention oversight triggers. We don't just match his framework — we fill its biggest hole. **This is the headline for Salim.**

### Peer artifact (competitive awareness)
OpenExO ships an official **"ExO 3.0 Claude Skill"** — a conversational tool that *explains* the framework (login-gated). We built the running system the framework describes. Guide vs implementation.

---

## Gap analysis (what's actually missing)

| Gap | Maps to | Effort | Pitch impact |
Expand Down
Loading