python@3.{10,11}: revision bump for alias migration

[branchv]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

We didn't rev bump in #114154 but I think we should so all users have the same python3

[michaelblyons]

Does the rev-bump need to go through "The tests are failing," "That one pre-dates the change," and so on? It took four months to get the #114154 through. Please don't delay too long before users actually see the benefits.

[branchv]

No this should be good to merge after a single CI run, we didn't intend for the other PR to take that long

[branchv]

Forgot the self-hosted label so Linux got halfway through before timing out, but without any failures. Don't think it's worth rerunning

[SMillerDev]

Do we have bottles for everything?

[branchv]

Yes all bottles were built/uploaded (here's the linux one)

[BrewTestBot]

@chenrui333 has triggered a merge.

[chenrui333]

Yeah, I can see the bottles for the linux run as well

2 bottles
ls: cannot access 'failed/*.json': No such file or directory
0 failed bottles