Open
Conversation
dawsontoth
force-pushed
the
STUDIO-669_gtm
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b91ac96 to
62b6fc3
Compare
kriszyp
requested changes
Mar 29, 2026
dawsontoth
force-pushed
the
STUDIO-669_gtm
branch
from
e3acd2a to
0dca0db
Compare
dawsontoth
force-pushed
the
STUDIO-669_gtm
branch
from
0dca0db to
c7a35cf
Compare
dawsontoth
commented
Apr 7, 2026
Comment on lines
+34
to
+40
| const { data: statusResponse, isLoading, isFetching } = useQuery(getStatusQueryOptions(instanceParams, ready)); | ||
|
|
||
| const isAvailable = statusResponse?.systemStatus?.[0]?.status === 'Available'; | ||
| const isUnavailable = statusResponse?.systemStatus?.[0]?.status === 'Unavailable'; | ||
| const statusMessage = typeof statusResponse?.data === 'string' | ||
| ? statusResponse.data | ||
| : (isAvailable ? DEFAULT_200_MSG : (isUnavailable ? DEFAULT_404_MSG : 'Unknown status')); |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is how we check if the instance is available or not, based on the first systemStatus.
dawsontoth
commented
Apr 7, 2026
| variant="destructiveGhost" | ||
| size="icon" | ||
| className="size-7" | ||
| onClick={() => setStatus({ ...instanceParams, id: 'availability', status: 'Unavailable' })} |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is how we set it to be unavailable.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
await server.operation({ operation: 'set_status', id: 'availability', status: 'Unavailable' });
Yeah looks right to me.
dawsontoth
commented
Apr 7, 2026
| variant="ghost" | ||
| size="icon" | ||
| className="size-7" | ||
| onClick={() => setStatus({ ...instanceParams, id: 'availability', status: 'Available' })} |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
And this is how we set it to be available.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
that looks right.
await server.operation({ operation: 'set_status', id: 'availability', status: 'Available' });
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cool, thanks! Experimentally it works too. :)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We'll use the
get_statusandset_statusoperations to read and write theid: 'availability'tostatus: 'Unavailable'orstatus: 'Available'for individual instances.https://harperdb.atlassian.net/browse/STUDIO-669