Otto Support - Testing MCP Servers#2324
Open
carlospolop wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
🔗 Additional ContextOriginal Blog Post: https://bishopfox.com/blog/otto-support-testing-mcp-servers Content Categories: Based on the analysis, this content was categorized under "AI Security > AI MCP Security". Repository Maintenance:
Review Notes:
Bot Version: HackTricks News Bot v1.0 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🤖 Automated Content Update
This PR was automatically generated by the HackTricks News Bot based on a technical blog post.
📝 Source Information
🎯 Content Summary
Bishop Fox's post demonstrates how to security test an exposed Model Context Protocol (MCP) server using the intentionally vulnerable otto-support application. The main issue found is a broken object-level authorization / IDOR-style flaw in the MCP tool
delete_ticket: a low-privileged authenticated user cannot read or edit other users' tickets, but can delete them by calling the MCP tool directly with another user'sticke...🔧 Technical Details
Testing MCP servers as APIs: MCP servers should be assessed like normal HTTP APIs. Start with network discovery, identify exposed HTTP services, then probe common MCP endpoints such as
/mcpand/sse. If the response contains MCP metadata such as a servername, the endpoint can often be enumerated and tested directly.Direct MCP tool invocation without prompt injection: If an MCP endpoint is reachable, an attacker may not need to manipulate an LLM. Tools can be called directly with JSON-RPC-style requests using
method: "tools/call",params.namefor the tool name, andparams.argumentsfor attacker-controlled inputs. This turns MCP tools into direct attack surfaces and makes server-side validation mandatory.Verbose diagnostic tool enumeration: Low-risk-looking tools such as
status,health, ordebugcan leak internal service metadata a...🤖 Agent Actions
Done.
Updated:
src/AI/AI-MCP-Servers.mdAdded:
tools/callread/update/deleteactionsAlso added the blog to:
## ReferencesValidation:
mdbook buildcould not be executed here becausemdbookis not installed in this environment (/bin/bash: mdbook: command not found)This PR was automatically created by the HackTricks Feed Bot. Please review the changes carefully before merging.