diff --git a/FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/1168.lean b/FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/1168.lean
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1f17b0189
--- /dev/null
+++ b/FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/1168.lean
@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+/-
+Copyright 2026 The Formal Conjectures Authors.
+
+Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+    https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+limitations under the License.
+-/
+
+import FormalConjectures.Util.ProblemImports
+
+/-!
+# Erdős Problem 1168
+
+**Verbatim statement (Erdős #1168, status O):**
+> Prove that\[\aleph_{\omega+1}\not\to (\aleph_{\omega+1}, 3,\ldots,3)_{\aleph_0}^2\]without assuming the generalised continuum hypothesis.
+
+**Source:** https://www.erdosproblems.com/1168
+
+**Notes:** OPEN
+
+
+*Reference:* [erdosproblems.com/1168](https://www.erdosproblems.com/1168)
+
+*References for known results:*
+- [EHR65] Erdős, Paul and Hajnal, András and Rado, Richard, Partition relations for cardinal
+  numbers. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. (1965), 93-196.
+- [Va99] Vâjâitu, Marius and Vaida, Dragoş, Partition relations for uncountable cardinals
+  without the GCH. J. Appl. Anal. (1999) 5(2), 257-267. (Reference 7.80 therein.)
+
+## Problem Statement
+
+Prove that
+$$\aleph_{\omega+1} \to (\aleph_{\omega+1}, \underbrace{3, 3, \ldots}_{\aleph_0})^2_{\aleph_0}$$
+**without** assuming the generalized continuum hypothesis (GCH).
+
+A problem of Erdős, Hajnal, and Rado. Under GCH the result is known (Erdős–Hajnal–Rado [EHR65]).
+The challenge is to prove it in plain ZFC.
+
+## The Partition Relation
+
+The notation $\kappa \to (\kappa, \underbrace{3, 3, \ldots}_{\aleph_0})^2_{\aleph_0}$ means:
+for any coloring of unordered pairs from the initial ordinal of $\kappa$ with countably many
+colors (indexed by $\mathbb{N}$), one of the following holds:
+* **Color 0** (*large monochromatic set*): there exists a subset $S$ of the vertex ordinal
+  with $|S| = \kappa$ such that every pair from $S$ receives color 0.
+* **Color $n+1$** (for some $n : \mathbb{N}$, *triangle*): there exist three distinct elements
+  $x, y, z$ from the vertex ordinal such that all three pairs $\{x,y\}$, $\{x,z\}$, $\{y,z\}$
+  receive color $n+1$.
+
+## Formalization Notes
+
+- We work with the **initial ordinal** `(ℵ_ (ω + 1)).ord` of `ℵ_{ω+1}` as the vertex set.
+  In Mathlib, `ℵ_ (ω + 1)` is `Cardinal.aleph (Ordinal.omega0 + 1)`.
+- **Countably many colors** are represented by `ℕ`, since `#ℕ = ℵ₀`.
+- The **GCH** is `∀ o : Ordinal, ℶ_ o = ℵ_ o`
+  (notation: `ℶ_` from the `Cardinal` namespace for `Cardinal.beth`).
+- Here `ω` in `ℵ_ (ω + 1)` is the ordinal `Ordinal.omega0` (the first infinite ordinal),
+  so `ℵ_ (ω + 1)` is indeed `ℵ_{\omega+1}`, the successor cardinal of the singular `ℵ_\omega`.
+-/
+
+open Cardinal Ordinal SimpleGraph
+
+namespace Erdos1168
+
+universe u
+
+/-
+### The countably-colored cardinal partition relation
+-/
+
+/--
+`CardinalCountableColorRamsey κ` asserts the partition relation
+`κ → (κ, 3, 3, …)²_{ℵ₀}` with countably many colors (indexed by `ℕ`).
+
+More precisely, it is a statement about the initial ordinal `κ.ord` of `κ`:
+for any coloring `col : Sym2 κ.ord.ToType → ℕ` of unordered pairs from `κ.ord.ToType`,
+one of the following holds:
+* **Color 0** (*large monochromatic set*): there exists a set `s ⊆ κ.ord.ToType` with
+  `#s = κ` such that every pair from `s` is colored 0 (i.e., `col ⟦(x, y)⟧ = 0`
+  for all distinct `x, y ∈ s`).
+* **Some positive color** (*triangle*): there exists `n : ℕ` and three distinct elements
+  `x y z : κ.ord.ToType` such that all three pairs are colored `n + 1`.
+
+This generalizes `OrdinalMultiColorRamsey` from finitely many colors (using `Fin (k+1)`) to
+countably many colors (using `ℕ`), consistent with the `ℵ_0` subscript in the partition notation.
+-/
+def CardinalCountableColorRamsey (κ : Cardinal.{u}) : Prop :=
+  ∀ col : Sym2 κ.ord.ToType → ℕ,
+    -- Either color-0 large monochromatic set of cardinality κ ...
+    (∃ s : Set κ.ord.ToType,
+      (∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → col s(x, y) = 0) ∧
+      #s = κ) ∨
+    -- ... or a monochromatic triangle in some positive color n+1.
+    (∃ (n : ℕ) (x y z : κ.ord.ToType),
+      x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧
+      col s(x, y) = n + 1 ∧
+      col s(x, z) = n + 1 ∧
+      col s(y, z) = n + 1)
+
+/-
+### The main open problem
+-/
+
+/--
+**OPEN**: Prove that $\aleph_{\omega+1} \not\to (\aleph_{\omega+1}, 3, 3, \ldots)^2_{\aleph_0}$
+without assuming the generalized continuum hypothesis.
+
+The source specifies the NOT-arrow (negative partition relation): there exists an
+$\aleph_0$-coloring of pairs from the initial ordinal of $\aleph_{\omega+1}$ such that
+neither
+* a color-0 monochromatic subset of cardinality $\aleph_{\omega+1}$ exists, nor
+* a positively-colored monochromatic triangle exists.
+
+The negative arrow is known under GCH (Erdős–Hajnal–Rado [EHR65]); the open problem (a
+problem of Erdős, Hajnal, and Rado) asks for a ZFC proof of the NOT-arrow.
+
+Here `ω` is `Ordinal.omega0` (the first infinite ordinal), so `ℵ_ (ω + 1)` is
+the successor cardinal of `ℵ_ω` (i.e., $\aleph_{\omega+1}$).
+
+**Status**: OPEN.
+-/
+@[category research open, AMS 5]
+theorem erdos_1168 : ¬ CardinalCountableColorRamsey (ℵ_ (ω + 1)) := by
+  sorry
+
+/-
+### Variants and known results
+-/
+
+namespace erdos_1168.variants
+
+/--
+**Generalized Continuum Hypothesis (GCH)**: the axiom asserting that for every ordinal `o`,
+the beth cardinal `ℶ_ o` equals the aleph cardinal `ℵ_ o`.
+
+Under GCH, $2^{\aleph_\gamma} = \aleph_{\gamma+1}$ for all ordinals $\gamma$, which makes
+the successor cardinal of a singular cardinal more tractable for partition calculus arguments.
+
+This is the hypothesis used in the known proofs of the Erdős–Hajnal–Rado partition result
+for $\aleph_{\omega+1}$ (see [EHR65]).
+-/
+def GCH : Prop := ∀ o : Ordinal.{0}, ℶ_ o = ℵ_ o
+
+/--
+**Erdős–Hajnal–Rado theorem under GCH** [EHR65]:
+$$\aleph_{\omega+1} \not\to (\aleph_{\omega+1}, \underbrace{3, 3, \ldots}_{\aleph_0})^2_{\aleph_0}$$
+assuming the generalized continuum hypothesis.
+
+Under GCH, the successor cardinal $\aleph_{\omega+1} = 2^{\aleph_\omega}$, which enables the
+Erdős–Hajnal–Rado partition calculus arguments for successors of singular cardinals.
+The proof uses the fact that under GCH, $\aleph_{\omega+1}$ is a successor of a singular cardinal
+of cofinality $\omega$, making the "polarized" and "stepping-up" lemmas of partition calculus
+applicable.
+
+**Status**: Proved under GCH by Erdős–Hajnal–Rado [EHR65].
+-/
+@[category research solved, AMS 5]
+theorem under_GCH (hGCH : GCH) : ¬ CardinalCountableColorRamsey (ℵ_ (ω + 1)) := by
+  sorry
+
+/--
+**ℵ_{ω+1} is uncountable**: ℵ_{ω+1} is strictly greater than ℵ₀, confirming it is a
+genuinely uncountable vertex-set size for the main conjecture.
+-/
+@[category test, AMS 5]
+example : ℵ₀ < ℵ_ (ω + 1) := by
+  rw [← aleph_zero]
+  apply aleph_lt_aleph.mpr
+  exact omega0_pos.trans_le le_self_add
+
+/--
+**ℵ_ω < ℵ_{ω+1}**: the cardinal ℵ_{ω+1} is strictly larger than ℵ_ω, confirming that
+ℵ_{ω+1} is indeed the *successor* cardinal of the singular ℵ_ω.
+-/
+@[category test, AMS 5]
+example : ℵ_ ω < ℵ_ (ω + 1) := by
+  exact aleph_lt_aleph.mpr (lt_add_one ω)
+
+/--
+**GCH implies 2^(ℵ_ω) = ℵ_{ω+1}**: under GCH, the power set of ℵ_ω equals ℵ_{ω+1}.
+
+Formally: if GCH holds then `ℶ_ (ω + 1) = ℵ_ (ω + 1)` and
+`ℶ_ (succ ω) = 2 ^ ℶ_ ω` (from the recurrence for beth), so
+`2 ^ ℵ_ ω = ℵ_ (ω + 1)` follows by the GCH equalities `ℶ_ ω = ℵ_ ω`.
+This is the key arithmetic fact used in the Erdős–Hajnal–Rado [EHR65] proof.
+-/
+@[category test, AMS 5]
+theorem GCH_implies_power_aleph_omega (hGCH : GCH) :
+    (2 : Cardinal.{0}) ^ ℵ_ ω = ℵ_ (ω + 1) := by
+  have h1 : ℶ_ ω = ℵ_ ω := hGCH ω
+  have h2 : ℶ_ (ω + 1) = ℵ_ (ω + 1) := hGCH (ω + 1)
+  have h3 : ℶ_ (ω + 1) = 2 ^ ℶ_ ω := by
+    rw [show (ω : Ordinal.{0}) + 1 = Order.succ ω from (add_one_eq_succ ω).symm]
+    exact beth_succ ω
+  have h4 : (2 : Cardinal.{0}) ^ ℵ_ ω = ℶ_ (ω + 1) := by
+    rw [h3]; congr 1; exact h1.symm
+  exact h4.trans h2
+
+/--
+**ℵ_{ω+1} is the successor of ℵ_ω**: a key structural fact used in partition calculus.
+
+This uses the Mathlib theorem `Cardinal.aleph_succ`:
+`ℵ_ (Ordinal.succ o) = Order.succ (ℵ_ o)` for all ordinals `o`.
+Since `ω + 1 = Ordinal.succ ω`, we get `ℵ_ (ω + 1) = Order.succ (ℵ_ ω)`.
+-/
+@[category test, AMS 5]
+theorem aleph_omega_succ_is_successor : ℵ_ (ω + 1) = Order.succ (ℵ_ ω) := by
+  conv_lhs => rw [show (ω : Ordinal) + 1 = Order.succ ω from (add_one_eq_succ ω).symm]
+  exact aleph_succ ω
+
+/--
+**Monotonicity**: if `CardinalCountableColorRamsey κ` holds and `μ ≤ κ`, then
+`CardinalCountableColorRamsey μ` holds. A coloring of `μ.ord`-pairs can be extended
+(via the initial segment embedding `μ.ord ↪ κ.ord`) to a coloring of `κ.ord`-pairs.
+The `κ`-instance then yields a monochromatic set or triangle in `κ.ord.ToType`; restricting
+to the image of `μ.ord.ToType` gives the conclusion for `μ`.
+
+**Status**: Open (the formal reduction requires ordinal embedding machinery).
+-/
+@[category research open, AMS 5]
+theorem mono_kappa {μ κ : Cardinal.{u}} (hle : μ ≤ κ)
+    (hκ : CardinalCountableColorRamsey κ) : CardinalCountableColorRamsey μ := by
+  sorry
+
+end erdos_1168.variants
+
+end Erdos1168