diff --git a/FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/1167.lean b/FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/1167.lean
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..038133c113
--- /dev/null
+++ b/FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/1167.lean
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
+/-
+Copyright 2026 The Formal Conjectures Authors.
+
+Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+    https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+limitations under the License.
+-/
+
+import FormalConjectures.Util.ProblemImports
+
+/-!
+# Erdős Problem 1167
+
+**Verbatim statement (Erdős #1167, status O):**
+> Let $r\geq 2$ be finite and $\lambda$ be an infinite cardinal. Let $\kappa_\alpha$ be cardinals for all $\alpha<\gamma$. Is it true that\[2^\lambda \to (\kappa_\alpha+1)_{\alpha<\gamma}^{r+1}\]implies\[\lambda \to (\kappa_\alpha)_{\alpha<\gamma}^{r}?\]Here $+$ means cardinal addition, so that $\kappa_\alpha+1=\kappa_\alpha$ if $\kappa_\alpha$ is infinite.
+
+**Source:** https://www.erdosproblems.com/1167
+
+**Notes:** OPEN
+
+
+*Reference:* [erdosproblems.com/1167](https://www.erdosproblems.com/1167)
+
+## Problem Statement
+
+Let $r \geq 2$ be finite and $\lambda$ be an infinite cardinal. Let $\kappa_\alpha$ be cardinals
+for all $\alpha < \gamma$. Is it true that
+$$2^\lambda \to (\kappa_\alpha + 1)_{\alpha < \gamma}^{r+1}$$
+implies
+$$\lambda \to (\kappa_\alpha)_{\alpha < \gamma}^r?$$
+
+Here the notation $\mu \to (\nu_\alpha)_{\alpha < \gamma}^s$ denotes the partition arrow: for
+every coloring of $s$-element subsets of a set of cardinality $\mu$ using colors indexed by
+$\alpha < \gamma$, there exists a monochromatic (homogeneous) subset of cardinality $\nu_\alpha$
+for some $\alpha < \gamma$.
+
+This is a problem of Erdős, Hajnal, and Rado.
+
+## Overview
+
+The central novelty in this file is `CardinalPartitionRel`: the general multicolor $r$-uniform
+partition relation $\mu \to (\nu_\alpha)_{\alpha < \gamma}^r$ for infinite cardinals.
+
+- `μ` (a `Cardinal`) is the size of the base set whose $r$-element subsets are colored.
+- `r : ℕ` is the uniformity (edges are $r$-element finite sets).
+- `γ` (an `Ordinal`) indexes the color classes.
+- `ν : γ.ToType → Cardinal` assigns a target cardinality to each color.
+
+The open question `erdos_1167` asks whether the $(r+1)$-uniform relation at $2^\lambda$
+(with targets $\kappa_\alpha + 1$) implies the $r$-uniform relation at $\lambda$
+(with targets $\kappa_\alpha$).
+
+## Formalization Notes
+
+- **r-element subsets**: We use `{s : Finset α // s.card = r}` as the type of $r$-element
+  subsets of a type `α` with `#α = μ`.
+- **Homogeneous set**: A set `H : Set α` is homogeneous for color `i` if every $r$-element
+  subset of `H` receives color `i`.
+- **Cardinal successor**: For an infinite cardinal $\kappa$, $\kappa + 1 = \kappa$ in cardinal
+  arithmetic. The $+1$ in the antecedent is thus only nontrivial when $\kappa_\alpha$ is finite.
+- We use `Ordinal.ToType` to turn the index ordinal `γ` into a type for the coloring function.
+- We avoid the identifier `λ` (reserved in Lean 4) and write `lam` for the cardinal $\lambda$.
+-/
+
+open Cardinal Ordinal
+
+namespace Erdos1167
+
+universe u
+
+/- ### The r-uniform cardinal partition relation -/
+
+/--
+`CardinalPartitionRel μ r γ ν` asserts the multicolor $r$-uniform partition relation
+$$\mu \to (\nu_\alpha)_{\alpha < \gamma}^r.$$
+
+It states: for any type `A` with `#A = μ` and any coloring `col` of the $r$-element finite
+subsets of `A` by `γ.ToType` (the colors indexed by ordinals less than `γ`), there exists:
+- a color `i : γ.ToType`, and
+- a subset `H : Set A` with `#H = ν i`,
+such that every $r$-element subset of `H` receives color `i`.
+
+When `γ = 2` and `r = 2` this reduces to the classical binary partition relation
+$\mu \to (\nu_0, \nu_1)^2$.
+-/
+def CardinalPartitionRel (μ : Cardinal.{u}) (r : ℕ) (γ : Ordinal.{u})
+    (ν : γ.ToType → Cardinal.{u}) : Prop :=
+  ∀ (A : Type u), #A = μ →
+    ∀ col : {s : Finset A // s.card = r} → γ.ToType,
+      ∃ (i : γ.ToType) (H : Set A),
+        #H = ν i ∧
+        ∀ (s : Finset A) (hs : s.card = r), (↑s : Set A) ⊆ H → col ⟨s, hs⟩ = i
+
+/- ### The main open problem -/
+
+/--
+**OPEN**: Let $r \geq 2$ be finite and $\lambda$ be an infinite cardinal. Let
+$\kappa_\alpha$ be cardinals for all $\alpha < \gamma$. Is it true that
+$$2^\lambda \to (\kappa_\alpha + 1)_{\alpha < \gamma}^{r+1} \implies
+  \lambda \to (\kappa_\alpha)_{\alpha < \gamma}^r?$$
+
+Here $\kappa_\alpha + 1$ denotes the cardinal successor (for finite $\kappa_\alpha$) or
+$\kappa_\alpha$ itself (for infinite $\kappa_\alpha$, since $\kappa + 1 = \kappa$).
+
+The relation $\mu \to (\nu_\alpha)_{\alpha < \gamma}^s$ is the $s$-uniform partition relation:
+every coloring of $s$-element subsets of a $\mu$-sized set by $\gamma$ colors yields a
+monochromatic set of size $\nu_\alpha$ for some $\alpha$.
+
+The "stepping-down" goes from $(r+1)$-uniform hypergraphs on a set of size $2^\lambda$ to
+$r$-uniform hypergraphs on a set of size $\lambda$.
+
+*A problem of Erdős, Hajnal, and Rado.*
+
+**Status**: OPEN.
+-/
+@[category research open, AMS 5]
+theorem erdos_1167 :
+    ∀ (r : ℕ), 2 ≤ r →
+    ∀ (lam : Cardinal.{u}), ℵ₀ ≤ lam →
+    ∀ (γ : Ordinal.{u}) (κ : γ.ToType → Cardinal.{u}),
+      -- Hypothesis: 2^lam → (κ_α + 1)_{α<γ}^{r+1}
+      CardinalPartitionRel ((2 : Cardinal.{u}) ^ lam) (r + 1) γ (fun α => κ α + 1) →
+      -- Conclusion: lam → (κ_α)_{α<γ}^r
+      CardinalPartitionRel lam r γ κ := by
+  sorry
+
+/- ### Variants and related results -/
+
+namespace erdos_1167.variants
+
+/--
+**Finite target case**: When all $\kappa_\alpha$ are finite, $\kappa_\alpha + 1$ in the
+partition relation is the ordinary successor natural number. This is the "classical" instance
+of the stepping-down problem: from $(r+1)$-uniform colorings on $2^\lambda$ to $r$-uniform
+colorings on $\lambda$, with finite target sizes.
+
+**Status**: OPEN (as a special case of `erdos_1167`).
+-/
+@[category research open, AMS 5]
+theorem finite_targets (r : ℕ) (hr : 2 ≤ r) (lam : Cardinal.{u}) (hlam : ℵ₀ ≤ lam)
+    (γ : Ordinal.{u}) (n : γ.ToType → ℕ) :
+    CardinalPartitionRel ((2 : Cardinal.{u}) ^ lam) (r + 1) γ
+        (fun α => (n α : Cardinal.{u}) + 1) →
+    CardinalPartitionRel lam r γ (fun α => (n α : Cardinal.{u})) := by
+  sorry
+
+/--
+**Binary case**: The $\gamma = 2$ specialization, i.e. two color classes.
+
+Is it true that $2^\lambda \to (\kappa_0 + 1, \kappa_1 + 1)^{r+1}$ implies
+$\lambda \to (\kappa_0, \kappa_1)^r$ for all $r \geq 2$ and infinite $\lambda$?
+
+**Status**: OPEN (as a special case of `erdos_1167`).
+-/
+@[category research open, AMS 5]
+theorem binary_colors (r : ℕ) (hr : 2 ≤ r) (lam κ₀ κ₁ : Cardinal.{u}) (hlam : ℵ₀ ≤ lam) :
+    -- γ = 2, colors indexed by Fin 2
+    (∀ (A : Type u), #A = (2 : Cardinal.{u}) ^ lam →
+      ∀ col : {s : Finset A // s.card = r + 1} → Fin 2,
+        (∃ H : Set A, #H = κ₀ + 1 ∧
+          ∀ (s : Finset A) (hs : s.card = r + 1),
+            (↑s : Set A) ⊆ H → col ⟨s, hs⟩ = 0) ∨
+        (∃ H : Set A, #H = κ₁ + 1 ∧
+          ∀ (s : Finset A) (hs : s.card = r + 1),
+            (↑s : Set A) ⊆ H → col ⟨s, hs⟩ = 1)) →
+    (∀ (A : Type u), #A = lam →
+      ∀ col : {s : Finset A // s.card = r} → Fin 2,
+        (∃ H : Set A, #H = κ₀ ∧
+          ∀ (s : Finset A) (hs : s.card = r),
+            (↑s : Set A) ⊆ H → col ⟨s, hs⟩ = 0) ∨
+        (∃ H : Set A, #H = κ₁ ∧
+          ∀ (s : Finset A) (hs : s.card = r),
+            (↑s : Set A) ⊆ H → col ⟨s, hs⟩ = 1)) := by
+  sorry
+
+/--
+**Infinite target case**: When all $\kappa_\alpha \geq \aleph_0$ are infinite, the cardinal
+successor satisfies $\kappa_\alpha + 1 = \kappa_\alpha$ in cardinal arithmetic, so the
+hypothesis simplifies to
+$$2^\lambda \to (\kappa_\alpha)_{\alpha < \gamma}^{r+1}$$
+implying
+$$\lambda \to (\kappa_\alpha)_{\alpha < \gamma}^r.$$
+
+The $+1$ disappears for infinite targets, making this a "pure" stepping-down lemma.
+
+**Status**: OPEN (as a special case of `erdos_1167`).
+-/
+@[category research open, AMS 5]
+theorem infinite_targets (r : ℕ) (hr : 2 ≤ r) (lam : Cardinal.{u}) (hlam : ℵ₀ ≤ lam)
+    (γ : Ordinal.{u}) (κ : γ.ToType → Cardinal.{u}) (hκ : ∀ i, ℵ₀ ≤ κ i) :
+    -- For infinite κ_α, κ_α + 1 = κ_α (so hypothesis and conclusion share the same targets)
+    CardinalPartitionRel ((2 : Cardinal.{u}) ^ lam) (r + 1) γ κ →
+    CardinalPartitionRel lam r γ κ := by
+  sorry
+
+/--
+**r = 2 case**: The stepping-down from 3-uniform to 2-uniform (pairs) partition relations.
+
+Is it true that $2^\lambda \to (\kappa_\alpha + 1)_{\alpha < \gamma}^3$ implies
+$\lambda \to (\kappa_\alpha)_{\alpha < \gamma}^2$?
+
+This is the case $r = 2$ of `erdos_1167` and is a generalization of the classical
+Erdős–Rado stepping-up/stepping-down theorems for pairs.
+
+**Status**: OPEN (as a special case of `erdos_1167`).
+-/
+@[category research open, AMS 5]
+theorem r_eq_two (lam : Cardinal.{u}) (hlam : ℵ₀ ≤ lam)
+    (γ : Ordinal.{u}) (κ : γ.ToType → Cardinal.{u}) :
+    CardinalPartitionRel ((2 : Cardinal.{u}) ^ lam) 3 γ (fun α => κ α + 1) →
+    CardinalPartitionRel lam 2 γ κ := by
+  sorry
+
+end erdos_1167.variants
+
+/- ### Sanity checks -/
+
+/--
+**Sanity check**: The hypothesis `ℵ₀ ≤ lam` is non-vacuous: $\aleph_0$ is an infinite cardinal.
+-/
+@[category test, AMS 5]
+example : ℵ₀ ≤ ℵ₀ := le_refl _
+
+/--
+**Sanity check**: $2^{\aleph_0} > \aleph_0$, so the power $2^\lambda$ is strictly larger than
+$\lambda$ for $\lambda = \aleph_0$. This confirms the two base sets in the stepping-down
+implication are genuinely of different sizes.
+-/
+@[category test, AMS 5]
+example : ℵ₀ < (2 : Cardinal) ^ ℵ₀ := Cardinal.cantor ℵ₀
+
+/--
+**Sanity check**: Every 0-element finset is empty. This confirms `Finset.card = 0` is
+non-trivial and that the condition `s.card = r` in `CardinalPartitionRel` correctly captures
+the notion of an $r$-element subset.
+-/
+@[category test, AMS 5]
+example (A : Type u) (s : Finset A) (hs : s.card = 0) : s = ∅ :=
+  Finset.card_eq_zero.mp hs
+
+end Erdos1167