feat: add pretty run report #416
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 10 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 2 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | WallTime | test_jit[lda] |
15.8 s | 7.9 s | +99.89% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | test_jit[lda] |
11.6 s | 7.3 s | +57.46% |
Tip
Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing kaeun97:kaeun97/pretty-report (568d6bf) with main (8812ec9)2
Footnotes
-
2 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
No successful run was found on
main(568d6bf) during the generation of this report, so 8812ec9 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩