@@ -463,14 +463,9 @@ fn display_effect_size(
463463 let ratio_ci = effect_size. half_width_confidence_interval / effect_size. a_mean ;
464464 writeln ! (
465465 output_file,
466- " {a_engine} is {ratio_min:.2}x to {ratio_max:.2}x {faster_slower} than {b_engine}!" ,
466+ " {a_engine} is {ratio_min:.2}x to {ratio_max:.2}x faster than {b_engine}!" ,
467467 a_engine = a_engine,
468468 b_engine = b_engine,
469- faster_slower = if effect_size. a_mean < effect_size. b_mean {
470- "FASTER"
471- } else {
472- "SLOWER"
473- } ,
474469 ratio_min = ratio - ratio_ci,
475470 ratio_max = ratio + ratio_ci,
476471 ) ?;
@@ -479,14 +474,9 @@ fn display_effect_size(
479474
480475 writeln ! (
481476 output_file,
482- " {b_engine} is {ratio_min:.2}x to {ratio_max:.2}x {faster_slower} than {a_engine}!" ,
477+ " {b_engine} is {ratio_min:.2}x to {ratio_max:.2}x faster than {a_engine}!" ,
483478 a_engine = a_engine,
484479 b_engine = b_engine,
485- faster_slower = if effect_size. b_mean < effect_size. a_mean {
486- "FASTER"
487- } else {
488- "SLOWER"
489- } ,
490480 ratio_min = ratio - ratio_ci,
491481 ratio_max = ratio + ratio_ci,
492482 ) ?;
@@ -644,8 +634,8 @@ compilation :: cycles :: benchmarks-next/pulldown-cmark/benchmark.wasm
644634
645635 Δ = 231879938.88 ± 5920528.32 (confidence = 95%)
646636
647- new_backend.so is 0.75x to 0.76x SLOWER than old_backend.so!
648- old_backend.so is 1.32x to 1.34x FASTER than new_backend.so!
637+ new_backend.so is 0.75x to 0.76x faster than old_backend.so!
638+ old_backend.so is 1.32x to 1.34x faster than new_backend.so!
649639
650640 [889384088 935555419.78 1045075629] new_backend.so
651641 [688072501 703675480.90 826253416] old_backend.so
@@ -654,8 +644,8 @@ compilation :: nanoseconds :: benchmarks-next/pulldown-cmark/benchmark.wasm
654644
655645 Δ = 79845660.57 ± 2038688.33 (confidence = 95%)
656646
657- new_backend.so is 0.75x to 0.76x SLOWER than old_backend.so!
658- old_backend.so is 1.32x to 1.34x FASTER than new_backend.so!
647+ new_backend.so is 0.75x to 0.76x faster than old_backend.so!
648+ old_backend.so is 1.32x to 1.34x faster than new_backend.so!
659649
660650 [306252409 322151144.14 359863566] new_backend.so
661651 [236932712 242305483.57 284514295] old_backend.so
@@ -664,8 +654,8 @@ execution :: nanoseconds :: benchmarks-next/pulldown-cmark/benchmark.wasm
664654
665655 Δ = 467229.61 ± 57708.35 (confidence = 95%)
666656
667- new_backend.so is 1.13x to 1.16x FASTER than old_backend.so!
668- old_backend.so is 0.86x to 0.89x SLOWER than new_backend.so!
657+ new_backend.so is 1.13x to 1.16x faster than old_backend.so!
658+ old_backend.so is 0.86x to 0.89x faster than new_backend.so!
669659
670660 [3061587 3240065.98 4419514] new_backend.so
671661 [3510983 3707295.59 5811112] old_backend.so
@@ -674,8 +664,8 @@ execution :: cycles :: benchmarks-next/pulldown-cmark/benchmark.wasm
674664
675665 Δ = 1356859.60 ± 167590.00 (confidence = 95%)
676666
677- new_backend.so is 1.13x to 1.16x FASTER than old_backend.so!
678- old_backend.so is 0.86x to 0.89x SLOWER than new_backend.so!
667+ new_backend.so is 1.13x to 1.16x faster than old_backend.so!
668+ old_backend.so is 0.86x to 0.89x faster than new_backend.so!
679669
680670 [8891120 9409439.69 12834660] new_backend.so
681671 [10196192 10766299.29 16875960] old_backend.so
0 commit comments