Android: package-selected visibility rules do not hide/show package layers correctly

[powext]

• I have updated Purchases SDK to the latest version
• I have read the Contribution Guidelines
• I have searched the Community
• I have read docs.revenuecat.com
• I have searched for existing Github issues

Describe the bug
On Android, package-selection-driven visibility can fail to update correctly inside a paywall package item.

The UX problem is that when a user selects a package, a layer inside that package card that should disappear for the selected state can remain visible. The selection itself changes, but the card does not fully update to reflect the new
visual state, so the paywall looks stale or inconsistent.

iOS (correct behavior):

Android (wrong behavior):

1. Environment
   1. Platform: Android
   2. SDK version: 9.29.0
   3. OS version: 14
   4. Android Studio version: -
   5. How widespread is the issue. Percentage of devices affected: -
2. Debug logs (https://docs.revenuecat.com/docs/debugging) that reproduce the issue
3. Steps to reproduce, with a description of expected vs. actual behavior
   1. Create a paywall with multiple packages.
   2. Add a conditional layer inside a package item that should hide once that package becomes selected.
   3. Open the paywall on Android.
   4. Tap that package.

A possible culprit is the selected-package evaluation in StackComponentState.kt. In particular, override resolution appears to use:

selectedPackageIdentifier = applicablePackage?.identifier

while applicablePackage appears to resolve like this:

style.rcPackage ?: selectedPackageProvider()

[vegaro]

Thanks for reporting @powext

I did try with your reproduction steps, hiding the "only..." text when the package is selected and it behaves correctly in purchases-android 9.29.0

Selected	Non-selected

So I am not sure how to reproduce your issue. I've been checking your paywall and it is fairly complex though and I am not sure if it's been modified since the time you took the screenshot, but I see that you're crossing out prices when the user is eligible for an intro price. Is it possible the Android user from your screenshot is eligible for a free trial? I see you are changing the header in your paywall configuration but not in your screenshot.