Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
106 lines (79 loc) · 4.84 KB

operational-controls.adoc

File metadata and controls

106 lines (79 loc) · 4.84 KB

Chronicle Threads Operational Controls

1. Relationship to Other Documents

This guide focuses on operational practices for deploying and running Chronicle Threads in production environments. It should be read alongside:

2. CPU Isolation and Affinity Governance

Why

Latency-sensitive handlers rely on predictable scheduling and cache residency.

Core controls
  • Reserve dedicated CPU cores for loops using busy pausers, aligning with documented recommendations (THR-DOC-016).

  • Validate runtime affinity strings against estate topology before deployment (THR-FN-015, THR-FN-017).

  • Record the chosen affinity mapping in run-books so support engineers can confirm compliance during incident response.

Review hot-spots
  • K8s or container orchestrators that may reassign cores.

  • BIOS or hypervisor changes that alter NUMA layout.

  • Third-party tooling that repins threads (profilers, debuggers).

3. Loop-Block Monitoring and Alerting

Why

A stalled handler compromises all work on its loop and introduces systemic jitter.

Core controls
  • Keep the monitor loop enabled in production to enforce execution thresholds (THR-NF-O-018, THR-NF-O-019).

  • Tune loop.block.threshold.ns and MONITOR_INTERVAL_MS via system properties to reflect acceptable tail latency (THR-OPS-023, THR-OPS-024).

  • Integrate PauserMonitorFactory outputs with telemetry collectors so SLO breaches surface quickly (THR-NF-O-021).

Review hot-spots
  • Handlers that call out to external services.

  • Contended locks inside business logic.

  • JVM safepoint pauses observable as correlated spikes across all loops.

4. Startup, Shutdown, and Recovery

Why

Predictable lifecycle management prevents resource leaks and eases maintenance.

Core controls
  • Configure shutdown hooks or explicit close ordering so loops stop gracefully and relinquish resources (THR-FN-002, THR-OPS-025).

  • Use builder precedence rules to override unsuitable host-wide defaults (THR-OPS-024).

  • Include loop topology and handler binding in operational documentation to guide failover drills.

Review hot-spots
  • Mutable static state shared across handlers that survives restart.

  • Incomplete handler deregistration causing repeated warnings during shutdown.

  • JVM exit sequences where native resources must release before process termination.

5. Configuration Hygiene

Why

Misconfiguration can disable safety features or erode performance targets.

Core controls
  • Maintain an allow-listed set of Chronicle Threads system properties and validate them in CI pipelines.

  • Version control default builder profiles for each environment (development, certification, production) and peer review changes.

  • Capture pauser and monitor settings in infrastructure-as-code artefacts to avoid snowflake deployments.

Review hot-spots
  • Ad-hoc overrides applied via command-line flags.

  • Legacy scripts that pre-date the Nine-Box taxonomy and omit traceability IDs.

  • Environment variable templating that truncates affinity strings.

6. Telemetry and Observability

Why

Workload visibility enables tuning and rapid diagnosis.

Core controls
  • Export pauser and loop-block metrics to the organisation-wide metrics pipeline (e.g., Prometheus, Graphite).

  • Correlate Chronicle Threads metrics with downstream components (Queues, Maps) to contextualise latency spikes.

  • Ensure monitor-loop warnings are promoted to actionable alerts rather than suppressed in logs.

Review hot-spots
  • Handlers that bypass standard logging frameworks.

  • Log rotation policies that discard stack traces before investigation.

  • Telemetry exporters that share threads with latency-sensitive loops.

7. Change Management

Why

Threading behaviour influences end-to-end latency; uncontrolled change increases risk.

Core controls
  • Pair configuration modifications with updated documentation and automated tests (THR-OPS-023).

  • Track requirement IDs (e.g., THR-NF-P-027) in change tickets so reviewers can verify continued compliance.

  • Simulate workload impact in a staging environment whenever pausers, affinities, or monitor thresholds change.

Review hot-spots
  • Hot fixes applied directly to production nodes.

  • Divergent configuration between active-active sites.

  • Missing rollback plans for affinity or pauser adjustments.