Repository navigation
General query #35
|
should I go for DICOM test like baseline,load testing,throughput testing or should i go for build a client on top of these PACS server. |
Replies: 5 comments 8 replies
|
That is up to you. The goal is to test the L4S in the networking setting. We have freedom in the approach of testing. |
|
Thanks! In that case, I’m inclined to start with DICOM performance tests — baseline, load, and throughput — to evaluate how L4S impacts network-level behavior under realistic PACS communication patterns. This will help quantify improvements in latency and congestion control. I can later consider building a lightweight DICOM client on top of it. |
|
@pradeeban, if you'd like me to work on a specific test, I’m happy to start on that. Currently, I was exploring things on my own since the repo didn’t have much to begin with. I’d also appreciate your feedback on whether I’m heading in the right direction, if the pace is okay, or if there’s anything else you’d like me to keep in mind. Suggestions are always welcome! |
|
WebRTC/L4S Integration |
|
I'm currently researching televisit implementation using L4S. Could you guide me on the best approach to proceed, particularly if there are any existing implementations or lessons learned from previous work. |
Previous iteration largely worked on simulations and understanding L4S. L4S has a lot of resources. You could read those. What we are trying is novel - so it has lots of research matters involved. On the flip side, it also means, we are doing things that are not well studied.