Currently it is recommended to use unconfidential addresses for Simplicity transactions due to some software limitations (probably in hal-simplicity or libraries that it uses), but we would like to have full support for using confidential addresses everywhere an unconfidential address is supported.
Currently it is recommended to use unconfidential addresses for Simplicity transactions due to some software limitations (probably in
hal-simplicityor libraries that it uses), but we would like to have full support for using confidential addresses everywhere an unconfidential address is supported.